A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF TECHNIQUES USED FOR POROUS MEMBRANE CHARACTERIZATION - PORE CHARACTERIZATION

被引:103
作者
KIM, KJ
FANE, AG
BENAIM, R
LIU, MG
JONSSON, G
TESSARO, IC
BROEK, AP
BARGEMAN, D
机构
[1] UNIV NEW S WALES, SCH CHEM ENGN & IND CHEM, CTR MEMBRANE SCI & TECHNOL, POB 1, KENSINGTON, NSW 2033, AUSTRALIA
[2] UNIV TECHNOL COMPIEGNE, DEPT GENIE CHIM, F-60206 COMPIEGNE, FRANCE
[3] TWENTE UNIV TECHNOL, DEPT CHEM TECHNOL, 7500 AE ENSCHEDE, NETHERLANDS
[4] TECH UNIV DENMARK, DEPT CHEM ENGN, DK-2800 LYNGBY, DENMARK
关键词
ULTRAFILTRATION; PORE CHARACTERIZATION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; PERMPOROMETRY; BILIQUID; THERMOPOROMETRY; MICROPOROUS AND POROUS MEMBRANES;
D O I
10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0044-E
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A range of commercial UF membranes have been characterized by thermoporometry, biliquid permporometry and molecular weight cut-off experiments. A comparison of results from these three independent techniques for the same types of membrane shows an indication of the strength and weakness of the methods. MWCO values determined from actual rejection-values using PEG and dextran were significantly lower than the manufacturer supplied data. The data obtained using the biliquid permporometry and solute rejection tests produced contrasting results for Amicon polysulfone (PM30) and regenerated cellulose (YM30) membranes. While MWCO determination resulted in sharper cut-off curves, the biliquid permporometry offered a broader size distribution with the PM30 and vice versa with the YM30. The pore sizes obtained by thermoporometry were significantly larger than those by the biliquid permporometry. The biliquid permporometry and thermoporometry give significantly higher values than the MWCO method. The closest comparison is obtained between the EM values and the MWCO method. This suggests that the controlling pore dimension for separation is the surface skin dimension.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 46
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] NEW METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF SIZE AND SHAPE OF PORES - THERMOPOROMETRY
    BRUN, M
    LALLEMAND, A
    QUINSON, JF
    EYRAUD, C
    [J]. THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1977, 21 (01) : 59 - 88
  • [2] CHARACTERIZATION OF WATER-STRUCTURE IN CELLULOSE-ACETATE MEMBRANES BY CALORIMETRIC MEASUREMENTS
    BURGHOFF, HG
    PUSCH, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 1979, 23 (02) : 473 - 484
  • [3] ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES - CHARACTERIZATION METHODS
    CAPANNELLI, G
    VIGO, F
    MUNARI, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1983, 15 (03) : 289 - 313
  • [4] DETERMINATION OF PORE SIZES AT THE SKIN LAYER OF AROMATIC POLYAMIDOHYDRAZIDE ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES
    CHAN, K
    MATSUURA, T
    RAJAN, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART C-POLYMER LETTERS, 1983, 21 (06) : 417 - 422
  • [5] Cheryan M., 1986, ULTRAFILTRATION HDB
  • [6] CRITICAL-POINTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF MEMBRANE PORE STRUCTURES BY THERMOPOROMETRY
    CUPERUS, FP
    BARGEMAN, D
    SMOLDERS, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1992, 66 (01) : 45 - 53
  • [7] Fane A.G., 1987, WORKSH CHAR ULTR MEM, P39
  • [8] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MEMBRANE-SURFACE PORE CHARACTERISTICS AND FLUX FOR ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES
    FANE, AG
    FELL, CJD
    WATERS, AG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1981, 9 (03) : 245 - 262
  • [9] Ultrafilter membranes and ultrafiltration
    Ferry, JD
    [J]. CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1936, 18 (03) : 373 - 455
  • [10] CHARACTERIZATION OF CLEAN AND FOULED ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES
    HANEMAAIJER, JH
    ROBBERTSEN, T
    VANDENBOOMGAARD, T
    OLIEMAN, C
    BOTH, P
    SCHMIDT, DG
    [J]. DESALINATION, 1988, 68 (2-3) : 93 - 108