DELIVERY OF ULTRASONIC NEBULIZED AEROSOLS TO A LUNG MODEL DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION

被引:65
作者
THOMAS, SHL
ODOHERTY, MJ
PAGE, CJ
TREACHER, DF
NUNAN, TO
机构
[1] UNITED MED & DENT SCH,DIV PHARMACOL SCI & TOXICOL,ST THOMAS CAMPUS,LONDON,ENGLAND
[2] ST THOMAS HOSP,INTENS THERAPY UNIT,LONDON SE1 7EH,ENGLAND
[3] ST THOMAS HOSP,DEPT NUCL MED,LONDON SE1 7EH,ENGLAND
来源
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE | 1993年 / 148卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1164/ajrccm/148.4_Pt_1.872
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Ultrasonic nebulizers may be particularly suitable for the administration of therapeutic aerosols to patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, but the amount of aerosol that reaches the patients' respiratory tract during ultrasonic nebulization has not been adequately studied. The delivery through an endotracheal tube of nebulized aerosols labeled with technetium-99m human serum albumin was therefore measured for five commercially available ultrasonic nebulizers using an in vitro model representing mechanical ventilation of an adult patient. Delivery of aerosol through the endotracheal tube ranged from 3.1 +/- 0.3% for Samsonic to 10.1 +/- 2.0% for Portasonic using 3 ml nebulizer solution. Increasing the volume of nebulizer solution to 18 ml (not possible for the Portasonic) increased delivery to 11.5 +/- 2.0 for the DP 100, 8.7 +/- 3.1 for Ultraneb, and 15.9 +/- 1.8% for Samsonic. Addition of a 600 ml aerosol storage chamber to the ventilator circuit increased delivery for the Samsonic (18 ml solution) to 22.3 +/- 5.0%. Aerosol delivery was also increased by reducing the respiratory rate and minute volume and by increasing the inspiratory time settings on the ventilator. These results confirm the potential value of ultrasonic nebulizers during mechanical ventilation and indicate that clinical trials in ventilated patients are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 877
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
DOLOVICH MB, 1977, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V115, P397
[2]  
DUBERSTEIN R, 1978, J PARENTER DRUG ASS, V32, P4
[3]  
FRASER I, 1981, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V123, P107
[4]   PRESSURIZED AEROSOL VERSUS JET AEROSOL DELIVERY TO MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS - COMPARISON OF DOSE TO THE LUNGS [J].
FULLER, HD ;
DOLOVICH, MB ;
POSMITUCK, G ;
PACK, WW ;
NEWHOUSE, MT .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1990, 141 (02) :440-444
[5]   EVALUATION OF BRONCHODILATOR RESPONSIVENESS IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS [J].
GAY, PC ;
RODARTE, JR ;
TAYYAB, M ;
HUBMAYR, RD .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1987, 136 (04) :880-885
[6]  
HO KKL, 1986, J PHARM PHARMACOL, V38, pP26
[7]  
HUGHES J M, 1987, Respiratory Care, V32, P1131
[8]  
KIM C S, 1984, American Review of Respiratory Disease, V129, pA110
[9]   AEROSOL DELIVERY IN INTUBATED, MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS [J].
MACINTYRE, NR ;
SILVER, RM ;
MILLER, CW ;
SCHULER, F ;
COLEMAN, RE .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1985, 13 (02) :81-84
[10]   DELIVERY OF A NEBULIZED AEROSOL TO A LUNG MODEL DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION - EFFECT OF VENTILATOR SETTINGS AND NEBULIZER TYPE, POSITION, AND VOLUME OF FILL [J].
ODOHERTY, MJ ;
THOMAS, SHL ;
PAGE, CJ ;
TREACHER, DF ;
NUNAN, TO .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1992, 146 (02) :383-388