PREDICTING PROGNOSIS OF GASTROINTESTINAL SMOOTH-MUSCLE TUMORS - ROLE OF CLINICAL AND HISTOLOGIC EVALUATION, FLOW-CYTOMETRY, AND IMAGE CYTOMETRY

Both flow cytometry (FCM) and morphometry have been proposed as techniques for predicting the prognosis of gastrointestinal (GI) smooth muscle tumors (SMTs). In particular, DNA aneuploidy by FCM has been associated with high histologic grade and shortened survival, whereas the DNA index determined by image cytometry has been proposed as a criterion for the diagnosis of malignancy. To further define the potential roles of these two techniques, we performed a variety of morphometric and FCM measurements on paraffin blocks from 122 patients with GI SMTs, with a median follow-up period of 6 years, together with assessments of tumor size and mitotic activity. None of the morphometric measurements (nuclear perimeter, area, form factor, longest diameter, average ferret diameter, equivalent diameter, and DNA index) was a significant prognostic factor when analyzed using a univariate Cox model. In contrast, the flow cytometric mean channel number, the fraction of cells in G2M, aneuploidy of the G0/G1 peak, aneuploidy of the G2M peak, tumor size, and mitotic activity index were statistically significant in univariate models, together with the patient age and sex, and whether or not the patient presented with metastases. In a multivariate model, > 10 mitotic figures per 50 high-power fields and metastases indicated a poor prognosis. If metastasis was not allowed to enter the model, the mitotic index and aneuploidy of the G2M peak portended a poor prognosis.