AGE GROUP-DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO TREATMENT FOR PROBLEMATIC ALCOHOL-USE

被引:46
作者
RICE, C
LONGABAUGH, R
BEATTIE, M
NOEL, N
机构
[1] BROWN UNIV, CTR ALCOHOL & ADDICT STUDIES, BOX G-BH POTTER, PROVIDENCE, RI 02912 USA
[2] VAMC, CTR HLTH CARE EVALUAT, MENLO PK, CA USA
[3] UNIV N CAROLINA, WILMINGTON, NC 28401 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02023.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
That structural characteristics act as markers of modified treatment outcome is a long standing idea in the alcohol treatment field. In order to test whether patient age is a factor to be considered in making treatment assignments, we examined data collected under a clinical trial. Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: extended cognitive behavioral treatment (CB), relationship enhancement (RE), or relationship and vocational enhancement (VE). This paper reports on outcome (alcohol use) 3-6 months after treatment assignment. Our question was, would different age groups assigned to the treatment conditions exhibit different outcomes? There were no significant main effects by either treatment condition or age group. There was a significant treatment condition by age group interaction. With increasing age, the differences in treatment seemed to increase. For the younger aged group (18-29 years old) no statistically significant treatment differences were detected. Middle aged patients (30-49 years old) did best in the RE condition. Older aged patients (50 + years old) did best when assigned to the CB condition. These findings lead us to conclude that patient age is a variable which should be considered when testing patient-treatment matching hypotheses.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1375
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, HDB AGING SOCIAL SCI
[2]  
Armor D. J., 1976, ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT
[3]   EFFECT OF THE SOCIAL-ENVIRONMENT ON ALCOHOL INVOLVEMENT AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING PRIOR TO ALCOHOLISM-TREATMENT [J].
BEATTIE, MC ;
LONGABAUGH, R ;
ELLIOTT, G ;
STOUT, RL ;
FAVA, J ;
NOEL, NE .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1993, 54 (03) :283-296
[4]   LIFE STRESSORS, SOCIAL RESOURCES, AND LATE-LIFE PROBLEM DRINKING [J].
BRENNAN, PL ;
MOOS, RH .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1990, 5 (04) :491-501
[5]   METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ESTIMATING MAIN AND INTERACTIVE EFFECTS - EXAMPLES FROM COPING SOCIAL SUPPORT AND STRESS-FIELD [J].
FINNEY, JW ;
MITCHELL, RE ;
CRONKITE, RC ;
MOOS, RH .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1984, 25 (01) :85-98
[6]  
Institute of Medicine Committee on Treatment of Alcohol Problems, 1990, BROADENING BASE TREA, DOI [10.17226/1341, DOI 10.17226/1341]
[7]   DEPRESSION-MOBILITY AND ITS SOCIAL ETIOLOGY - THE ROLE OF LIFE EVENTS AND SOCIAL SUPPORT [J].
LIN, N ;
ENSEL, WM .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1984, 25 (02) :176-188
[8]   THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL INVESTMENT ON TREATMENT OUTCOME [J].
LONGABAUGH, R ;
BEATTIE, M ;
NOEL, N ;
STOUT, R ;
MALLOY, P .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1993, 54 (04) :465-478
[9]  
LONGABAUGH R, 1985, NIAAA RES MONOGRAPH, V15
[10]  
MCGOUGH DP, 1986, GUIDE PLANNING ALCOH