A RATIONALE FOR PREDICTING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE GRAFT IMPINGEMENT BY THE INTERCONDYLAR ROOF - A MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING STUDY

被引：122

作者：

HOWELL, SM ^{[1
]}

USAFR, MM ^{[1
]}

CLARK, JA ^{[1
]}

FARLEY, TE ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] DAVID GRANT USAF MED CTR,TRAVIS AFB,CA 94535

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 1991年 / 19卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1177/036354659101900312

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

This study was designed to analyze how anterior tibial tunnel placement can result in graft impingement by the intercondylar roof. The relationship of the ACL to the intercondylar roof was studied using magnetic resonance scans. An attempt was made to predict the amount of bone that may need to be removed from the intercondylar roof to prevent impingement on a 10 mm thick ACL graft. Magnetic resonance scans of 19 normal ACLs were analyzed. The amount of bone removal required to correct roof impingement was determined for a graft placed either eccentrically or centrally within the ACL insertion, and within the bulk of the normal ACL fibers. An eccentric tibial tunnel placement required approximately 5 to 6 mm and a central placement required 2 to 3 mm of bone removal from the intercondylar roof to prevent impingement. Placing the graft within the bulk of the ACL fibers, just 3 mm posterior to the center of the ACL insertion, required little bone resection to prevent impingement. To prevent ACL graft impingement, roofplasties need to be performed in both acute and chronic ACL reconstructions if the presently accepted locations for positioning the tibial tunnel are used. A more anteriorly placed tibial tunnel requires more bone removal to prevent roof impingement than a more posteriorly positioned tibial tunnel.

引用

页码：276 / 282

页数：7

共 26 条

[1]

Anderson A.F., Lipscomb B.A., Addlestone R.B., Analysis of the intercondylar notch by computed tomography, Am J Sports Med, 15, pp. 547-552, (1987)

[2]

Bellon E.M., Keith M.W., Coleman P.E., Et al., Radiographics, 8, pp. 95-117, (1988)

[3]

Bradley J., Fitz P.D., Daniel D., Et al., J Bone Joint Surg, 70B, pp. 94-99, (1988)

[4]

Burk D.L., Kanal E., Brunberg J.A., Et al., AJR, 147, pp. 293-300, (1986)

[5]

Clancy W., Nelson D., Reider B., Et al., J Bone Joint Surg, 64A, pp. 352-359, (1982)

[6]

Fullerton L.R., Andrews J.R., Mechanical block to extension following augmentation of the anterior cruciate ligament: A case report, Am J Sports Med, 12, pp. 166-168, (1984)

[7]

Gallimore G.W., Harms S.E., Knee injuries: High-resolution, MR imaging Radiology, 160, pp. 457-461, (1986)

[8]

Gillquist J., Odensten M., Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, Arthroscopy, 4, pp. 5-9, (1988)

[9]

Good L., Odensten M., Gillquist J., Precision in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, Acta Orthop Scand, 58, pp. 658-661, (1987)

[10]

Graf B., Uhr F., Complications of intra-articular anterior cruciate reconstruction, Clin Sports Med, 7, pp. 835-838, (1988)

← 1 2 3 →