EFFECT OF BREED AND BODY-WEIGHT ON ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC VALUES IN 4 BREEDS OF DOGS OF DIFFERING SOMATOTYPE

被引:132
作者
MORRISON, SA
MOISE, NS
SCARLETT, J
MOHAMMED, H
YEAGER, AE
机构
[1] Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1939-1676.1992.tb00342.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Eighty normal dogs of four morphologically disparate breeds (Pembroke Welsh Corgi, Miniature Poodle, Afghan Hound, Golden Retriever) (twenty of each breed), were studied by echocardiography to determine the importance of breed and weight in establishing normal echocardiographic reference ranges. Echocardiographic measurements included left-ventricular chamber dimension at systole and end-diastole, right-ventricular chamber dimension at end-diastole, interventricular septal thickness at systole and end-diastole, left-ventricular free wall thickness at systole and end-diastole, E-point septal separation, aortic root dimension at end-diastole, left atrial dimension, and fractional shortening. Analyses of covariance indicated that for all measurements except right-ventricular chamber dimension, the means were significantly different among breeds, after the differences in weight were taken into account. Echocardiographic measurements are variable even within the same breed. Breed must be considered in establishing echocardiographic measurement reference ranges. Echocardiographic values for each breed are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Gooding JP, Robinson WF, Mews GC., Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dimensions in clinically normal English cocker spaniels, Am J Vet Res, 47, pp. 293-300, (1986)
[2]  
Boon J., Wingfield WE, Miller CW., Echocardiographic indices in the normal dog, Veterinary Radiology, 24, pp. 214-221, (1983)
[3]  
Lombard CW., Normal values of the canine M‐mode echocardiogram, Am J Vet Res, 45, pp. 2015-2018, (1984)
[4]  
Mashiro I., Nelson RR, Cohn JH, Et al., Ventricular dimensions measured noninvasively by echocardiography in the awake dog, J Appl Physiol, 41, pp. 953-959, (1976)
[5]  
Tilley LP., Analysis of canine P‐QRS‐T deflections, Essentials of Canine and Feline Electrocardiography, (1985)
[6]  
Sahn DJ, DeMaria A., Kisslo J., Et al., Recommendations regarding quantitation in M‐mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements, Circulation, 58, pp. 1072-1083, (1978)
[7]  
Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE., Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, pp. 297-307, (1988)
[8]  
Schummer A., Vollmerhaus B., Wilkens H., Et al., Anatomy of Domestic Animals: The Cardiovascular System, (1981)
[9]  
Valdez RS, Motta JA, London E., Et al., Evaluation of the echocardiogram as an epidemiologic tool in an asymptomatic population, Circulation, 60, pp. 921-929, (1979)
[10]  
Gutgesell HP, Paquet M., Duff DF, Et al., Evaluation ofleft ventricular size and function by echocardiography‐results in normal children, Circulation, 56, pp. 457-462, (1977)