HIGH-GRADE SQUAMOUS CERVICAL LESIONS FOLLOWING NEGATIVE PAPANICOLAOU SMEARS - FALSE-NEGATIVE CERVICAL CYTOLOGY OR RAPID PROGRESSION

被引:76
作者
HATEM, F
WILBUR, DC
机构
[1] Cytopathology Unit, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
关键词
CERVIX; CYTOLOGY; PAPANICOLAOU SMEAR; DYSPLASIA; FALSE-NEGATIVE;
D O I
10.1002/dc.2840120209
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The cervical cytologic finding of a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL) or carcinoma shortly following a negative smear is unusual. To determine if such cases are due to screening errors, inadequate sampling, or rapidly progressive lesions, a review of negative smears (immediately preceding a diagnosis of HGSIL or carcinoma by at most 2 yr) was performed on 17 patients (all such patients in our 1990-99 files, representing 6% (17/290) of such diagnoses). The time between negative smear and positive result averaged 9.3 mo. Eighty-eight percent of these patients had prior histories of a cytologic abnormality. Upon review, 16 of 17 ''negative'' smears contained a cytologic abnormality. Atypical immature squamous metaplastic type cells (AISMTs) were found in 11 of 16 cases, atypical squamous cells or slight dysplasia were found in 5 of 16, HGSIL was found in 5 of 16, and atypical cells of undetermined type and origin were noted in 1 of 16. Combinations of the above diagnoses were present in 6 of 16 cases. The number of abnormal cells per slide was estimated, with < 10 cells in 1 case, < 50 in 4 cases, 50-100 in 7 cases, 100-200 in 3 cases, and > 200 in 1 case. In this study, screening and/or evaluation errors were the dominant cause of false-negative cytologic diagnoses, with AISMTs accounting for the most commonly missed or misinterpreted cells. These cells are small and have hyperchromatic nuclei with elevated nucleus to cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear irregularities. They may occur singly or in small groups, and may be interpreted as small histiocytes or missed entirely on screening. A careful search far such cells is warranted, and in their presence, colposcopy and biopsy should be undertaken. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 141
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Patten SF, Diagnostic cytopathology of the uterine cervix. Monographs in clinical cytology, 3, pp. 138-145, (1978)
  • [2] Hall JE, Walton L, Dysplasia of the cervix. A prospective study of 206 cases, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 100, pp. 662-667, (1968)
  • [3] Richart RM, Barron BA, A follow‐up study of patients with cervical dysplasia, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 105, 3, pp. 386-393, (1969)
  • [4] Syrjanen K, Kataja V, Yliskoski M, Et al., Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus lesions does not substantiate the biological relevance of the Bethesda System, Obstet Gynecol, 79, pp. 675-682, (1992)
  • [5] Rylander E, Negative smears in women developing invasive cervical cancer, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 56, pp. 115-118, (1977)
  • [6] Pairwuti S, False‐negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix, Acta Cytol, 35, pp. 40-46, (1991)
  • [7] Kristensen GB, Skyggebjerg KD, Holund B, Et al., Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer, Acta Cytol, 35, pp. 47-50, (1991)
  • [8] Joseph MG, Cragg F, Wright VC, Et al., Cyto‐histologic correlates in a colposcopic clinic: a 1‐year prospective study, Diagn Cytopathol, 7, pp. 477-481, (1991)
  • [9] Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goellner JR, False negative results in cervical cytologic studies, Acta Cytol, 29, pp. 1043-1046, (1985)
  • [10] Wilbur DC, Cibas ES, Merritt S, Et al., ThinPrep Processor. Clinical trials demonstrate an increased detection rate of abnormal cervical cytologic specimens, Am J Clin Pathol, 101, pp. 209-214, (1994)