NEONATAL MORPHOMETRIC INDEXES OF FETAL GROWTH - ANALYSIS OF OBSERVER VARIABILITY

被引:9
作者
CHANG, TC [1 ]
ROBSON, SC [1 ]
SPENCER, JAD [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, SCH MED, DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL, LONDON WC1E 6HX, ENGLAND
关键词
SKINFOLD THICKNESS; PONDERAL INDEX; MIDARM CIRCUMFERENCE/HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO; REPRODUCIBILITY; NEONATAL MORPHOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/0378-3782(93)90137-J
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Measurements of triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness, mid-arm circumference (MAC), head circumference (HC) and crown-heel length were performed by two observers in 30 healthy neonates. Intra-observer standard deviation for all measurements, calculated using one-way analysis of variance, was small and similar for each observer. Inter-observer variability was assessed using limits of agreement. There were small, systematic, differences between observers for measurements of triceps skinfold thickness and crown-heel length, and for calculated ponderal index (PI). When related to respective published reference ranges, the 95% prediction intervals for subscapular (-0.51, 0.68 mm) and triceps (-0.65, 0.29 mm) skinfold thicknesses were less than those for the MAC/HC ratio (-2.1, 1.9) and PI (-0.23, 0.28). The results indicate that skinfold thickness measurements are a more robust measure and, therefore, may be of greater value in the assessment of neonates with suspected fetal growth retardation.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS OF ASSESSING INTER-OBSERVER VARIATION APPLIED TO MEASUREMENT OF THE SYMPHYSIS FUNDAL HEIGHT [J].
BAILEY, SM ;
SARMANDAL, P ;
GRANT, JM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (11) :1266-1271
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   NONINVASIVE APPROACH TO BODY COMPOSITION IN NEONATE - DYNAMIC SKINFOLD MEASUREMENTS [J].
BRANS, YW ;
SUMNERS, JE ;
DWECK, HS ;
CASSADY, G .
PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1974, 8 (04) :215-222
[4]  
BRANSON RS, 1982, HUM BIOL, V54, P137
[5]   STATISTICAL-METHODS FOR ASSESSING OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN CLINICAL MEASURES [J].
BRENNAN, P ;
SILMAN, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6840) :1491-1494
[6]  
BURKINSHAW L, 1973, HUM BIOL, V45, P273
[7]  
CATALANO PM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P46
[8]   HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO, PONDERAL INDEX AND FETAL MALNUTRITION - SHOULD HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO BE ABANDONED [J].
COLLEY, NV ;
TREMBLE, JM ;
HENSON, GL ;
COLE, TJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (06) :524-527
[9]   ANTHROPOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF NUTRITIONAL-STATUS IN NEWBORN-INFANTS - DISCRIMINATIVE VALUE OF MID ARM CIRCUMFERENCE AND OF SKINFOLD THICKNESS [J].
EXCLER, JL ;
SANN, L ;
LASNE, Y ;
PICARD, J .
EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1985, 11 (02) :169-178
[10]  
GEORGIEFF MK, 1988, ACTA PAEDIATR SCAND, V77, P24