CROP ROTATIONS FOR THE 21ST-CENTURY

被引:319
作者
KARLEN, DL
VARVEL, GE
BULLOCK, DG
CRUSE, RM
机构
[1] UNIV NEBRASKA, USDA ARS, SOIL WATER CONSERVAT RES UNIT, LINCOLN, NE 68583 USA
[2] UNIV ILLINOIS, DEPT AGRON, URBANA, IL 61801 USA
[3] IOWA STATE UNIV SCI & TECHNOL, DEPT AGRON, AMES, IA 50011 USA
来源
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 53 | 1994年 / 53卷
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60611-2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Advantages and disadvantages of crop rotation have undoubtedly been debated for thousands of years, as documented by historians (White, 1970b) who have stated that rotation systems were widely recommended by Roman agronomists, but often not adopted by local farmers. One reason for farmer hesitancy to use crop rotation may be that agricultural scientists are still unable to explain the mysterious “rotation effect.” Macroeconomic and microeconomic considerations have and presumably will always influence land use decisions, such as adoption of crop rotation. For the U.S. corn belt, this was well documented by Wiancko (1927), but economic considerations must include a more complete accounting for both on-site and offsite impacts of our soil and crop management practices. Benefits of crop rotation for land and water resource protection and productivity have been identified, but processes and mechanisms responsible for those benefits need to be better understood. This is a critical area for basic and applied research. Public policies that influence land use decisions, such as crop rotation, need to be as flexible as possible to encourage adoption of practices that are economically viable, environmentally sustainable, and socially acceptable. Following this agenda will ensure that crop rotations have a major role in 21st century agriculture. © 1994 Academic Press Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 45
页数:45
相关论文
共 199 条
[1]   EFFECT OF CROPPING SYSTEMS AND NITROGEN LEVELS ON CORN (ZEA-MAYS) YIELDS IN SOUTHERN PIEDMONT REGION [J].
ADAMS, WE ;
MORRIS, HD ;
DAWSON, RN .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1970, 62 (05) :655-+
[2]  
ADAMS WE, 1964, USDAARS4183
[3]   CORN AND SOYBEAN CROPPING EFFECTS ON SOIL LOSSES AND C-FACTORS [J].
ALBERTS, EE ;
WENDT, RC ;
BURWELL, RE .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (03) :721-728
[4]   PREDICTING CROP YIELD REDUCTIONS FROM WEEDS [J].
ALDRICH, RJ .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 1 (03) :199-206
[5]  
ALDRICH SR, 1964, 19TH P ANN HYBR CORN, P7
[6]  
Allison F. E., 1973, Soil organic matter and its role in crop production.
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1980, REPORT RECOMMENDATIO
[8]  
BAILEY BA, 1978, 277E FLOR COOP EXT S
[9]   WEED SEEDBANK RESPONSE TO TILLAGE, HERBICIDES, AND CROP-ROTATION SEQUENCE [J].
BALL, DA .
WEED SCIENCE, 1992, 40 (04) :654-659