COMPARISON OF 2 INDEXES OF DENTAL FLUOROSIS IN LOW, MODERATE AND HIGH FLUOROSIS TANZANIAN POPULATIONS

被引:19
作者
MABELYA, L
VANTHOF, MA
KONIG, KG
HELDERMAN, WHP
机构
[1] UNIV DAR ES SALAAM, DEPT COMMUNITY & PREVENT DENT, DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA
[2] UNIV NIJMEGEN, DEPT MATH & STAT CONSULTAT, NIJMEGEN, NETHERLANDS
[3] UNIV NIJMEGEN, DEPT PREVENT DENT, NIJMEGEN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
DENTAL FLUOROSIS; DEANS INDEX; THYLSTRUP-FEJERSKOV INDEX;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb00789.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
This study aimed at comparing the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index (TFI) and the Dean's Index (DI) which were applied on three communities with different severity of dental fluorosis. A total of 1565 children aged between 11 and 18 yr with a mean age of 14.7 were examined for dental fluorosis with the TFI and 1155 of these children were also examined with the DI. The measurement error for the TFI was 0.50 (10 scale point) compared to 0.53 for DI (6 scale point). The Kappa values and the measurement-remeasurement correlation appeared to be better for the TFI. No difficulties were encountered in applying the TFI in contrast to the DI, which caused uncertainties in assessing the ''questionable'' and ''very mild'' scores, and this may explain the relatively better reproducibility of the TFI. The correspondence between both indices was determined. TFI 0 corresponded well with DIG. The conversion values for TFI 1, 2, 3 and 4 into DI scores were 0.3, 0.8, 1.4 and 2.4 respectively. The TFI 5-9 corresponded with DI score 4. TFI could discriminate the severe forms of dental fluorosis which were categorized in Dean's highest score 4. TFI was able to reveal more dental fluorosis than DI in communities with minor and moderate dental fluorosis. In the community with severe dental fluorosis where more than 85% of all teeth exhibited a DI greater than or equal to 1, both indices revealed a comparable prevalence of dental fluorosis. The TFI is considered a near ideal instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 420
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
ALLOUSI W, 1975, BRIT DENT J 2, V138, P56
[2]
ALLOUSI W, 1975, BRIT DENT J 1, V139, P9
[3]
[Anonymous], 1982, Int Dent J, V32, P159
[4]
COMPARISON OF 2 FLUOROSIS INDEXES IN THE PRIMARY DENTITION OF TSWANA CHILDREN [J].
BURGER, P ;
CLEATONJONES, P ;
DUPLESSIS, J ;
DEVRIES, J .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 15 (02) :95-97
[5]
Dean H.T., 1934, J AM DENT ASS 1922, V21, P1421, DOI [10.14219/jada.archive.1934.0220, DOI 10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.1934.0220]
[6]
DEAN HT, 1942, FLUORINE DENTAL HLTH, P23
[7]
Fejerskov O, 1990, J Dent Res, V69 Spec No, P692
[8]
FEJERSKOV O, 1986, DENTAL FLUOROSIS HDB
[9]
DIAGNOSIS OF MILD ENAMEL FLUOROSIS IN PERMANENT MAXILLARY INCISORS USING 2 SCORING SYSTEMS [J].
GRANATH, L ;
WIDENHEIM, J ;
BIRKHED, D .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1985, 13 (05) :273-276
[10]
A NEW METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE PREVALENCE OF DENTAL FLUOROSIS - THE TOOTH SURFACE INDEX OF FLUOROSIS [J].
HOROWITZ, HS ;
DRISCOLL, WS ;
MEYERS, RJ ;
HEIFETZ, SB ;
KINGMAN, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 109 (01) :37-41