Alternatives in cosmetics testing

被引:10
作者
Loprieno, N
Bruner, LH
Carr, GJ
Chamberlain, M
Cottin, M
DeSilva, O
Kato, S
机构
[1] PROCTER & GAMBLE CO,HLTH & BEAUTY CARE LTD,REGULATORY & CLIN DEV,EGHAM TW20 9NW,SURREY,ENGLAND
[2] PROCTER & GAMBLE CO,BIOMETR & STAT SCI DEPT,REGULATORY & CLIN DEV,MIAMI VALLEY LABS,CINCINNATI,OH 45239
[3] UNILEVER RES & ENGN,ENVIRONM SAFETY LAB,SHARNBROOK MK44 1LQ,BEDS,ENGLAND
[4] LOREAL,CENT DEPT PROD SAFETY,F-93601 AULNAY SOUS BOIS,FRANCE
[5] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,DEPT DERMATOL,CUTANEOUS BIOL RES CTR,BOSTON,MA 02129
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0887-2333(95)00091-7
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
This paper represents a summary of presentations made during a round-table discussion at the ECVAM Opening Symposium. After introductory comments on the cosmetic industry's use of alternative methods in the safety assessment process, the use of alternative methods by L'Oreal and by the Japanese cosmetic industry is outlined, current validation studies in Japan are noted, and the involvement of COLIPA, the European Cosmetic, Toiletry and Perfumery Association, in promoting the use of alternative methods is discussed. Two final sections deal with the effect of data variability on the performance of alternative methods in validation studies and on the integrated use of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis with other approaches in the safety assessment process.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 838
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条