GOSERELIN VERSUS ORCHIECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER - FINAL RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL

被引:117
作者
VOGELZANG, NJ
CHODAK, GW
SOLOWAY, MS
BLOCK, NL
SCHELLHAMMER, PF
SMITH, JA
CAPLAN, RJ
KENNEALEY, GT
机构
[1] WEISS MEM HOSP,CHICAGO,IL
[2] UNIV MIAMI,SCH MED,MIAMI,FL 33152
[3] EASTERN VIRGINIA MED SCH,NORFOLK,VA 23501
[4] VANDERBILT UNIV,MED CTR,NASHVILLE,TN 37240
[5] ZENECA PHARMACEUT,WILMINGTON,DE
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80197-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To compare the efficacy and safety of goserelin and orchiectomy in patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer. Methods. A randomized, open, multicenter study was conducted in 283 patients. Patients were allocated to goserelin, 3.6 mg every 28 days, or to orchiectomy. Study end points were endocrine response, objective response, time to treatment failure, survival, and tolerability. Objective response was based on modified criteria of the National Prostate Cancer Project. Results. Serum testosterone decreased from baseline to castrate levels by week 4 in each group and remained below castrate levels thereafter. Acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase concentrations also decreased in each group. The goserelin and orchiectomy groups had similar results for objective response (82% versus 77%) and had similar median times to treatment failure (52 versus 53 weeks) and survival (119 versus 136 weeks). No significant interactions between treatments and prognostic factors were observed, Adjusting for baseline testosterone concentration had no effect on survival outcome. Race had no influence on outcome or efficacy end points. Common adverse events in both groups were pain, hot flushes, and lower urinary tract symptoms. Conclusions. Goserelin is well tolerated and as effective as orchiectomy in patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 226
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   CANCER STATISTICS, 1994 [J].
BORING, CC ;
SQUIRES, TS ;
TONG, T ;
MONTGOMERY, S .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1994, 44 (01) :7-26
[2]  
Cassileth B R, 1992, Qual Life Res, V1, P323, DOI 10.1007/BF00434946
[3]   PATIENTS CHOICE OF TREATMENT IN STAGE-D PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
SOLOWAY, MS ;
VOGELZANG, NJ ;
SCHELLHAMMER, PS ;
SEIDMON, EJ ;
HAIT, HI ;
KENNEALEY, GT .
UROLOGY, 1989, 33 (05) :57-62
[4]   INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC (STAGE-D2) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
CHODAK, GW ;
VOGELZANG, NJ ;
CAPLAN, RJ ;
SOLOWAY, M ;
SMITH, JA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (05) :618-621
[5]   A COMPARISON OF ZOLADEX AND DES IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER TRIAL [J].
CITRIN, DL ;
RESNICK, MI ;
GUINAN, P ;
ALBUSSAM, N ;
SCOTT, M ;
GAU, TC ;
KENNEALEY, GT .
PROSTATE, 1991, 18 (02) :139-146
[6]  
CRAWFORD ED, 1989, NEW ENGL J MED, V31, P419
[7]   MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PROSTATIC-CANCER - RESULTS FROM 2 EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR RESEARCH ON TREATMENT OF CANCER TRIALS [J].
DEVOOGT, HJ ;
SUCIU, S ;
SYLVESTER, R ;
PAVONEMACALUSO, M ;
SMITH, PH ;
DEPAUW, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (04) :883-888
[8]   HEMOSTATIC CHANGES DURING HORMONE MANIPULATION IN ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER - A COMPARISON OF DES 3-MG DAY AND GOSERELIN 3.6-MG MONTH [J].
EMTAGE, LA ;
GEORGE, J ;
BOUGHTON, BJ ;
TRETHOWAN, C ;
BLACKLEDGE, GRP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 26 (03) :315-319
[9]  
GLODE LM, 1991, P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL, V10, P175
[10]   ORCHIECTOMY AND NILUTAMIDE OR PLACEBO AS TREATMENT OF METASTATIC PROSTATIC-CANCER IN A MULTINATIONAL DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
JANKNEGT, RA ;
ABBOU, CC ;
BARTOLETTI, R ;
BERNSTEINHAHN, L ;
BRACKEN, B ;
BRISSET, JM ;
DASILVA, FC ;
CHISHOLM, G ;
CRAWFORD, ED ;
DEBRUYNE, FMJ ;
DIJKMAN, GD ;
FRICK, J ;
GOEDHALS, L ;
KNONAGEL, H ;
VENNER, PM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (01) :77-83