POLYMORPHISM IN HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS, EVOLUTION OF HABITAT SELECTION AND SYMPATRIC SPECIATION - SOFT AND HARD SELECTION MODELS

被引:67
作者
DEMEEUS, T
MICHALAKIS, Y
RENAUD, F
OLIVIERI, I
机构
[1] Laboratoire de Parasitologie Comparée, URA 698 CNRS, Université Montpellier II (USTL), Montpellier Cedex 05, 34095, Place E. Bataillon
关键词
POLYMORPHISM; VARIABLE ENVIRONMENTS; HABITAT SELECTION; SPECIATION; SOFT SELECTION; HARD SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/BF01239387
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The adaptation to a variable environment has been studied within soft and hard selection frameworks. It is shown that an epistatically determined habitat preference, following a Markovian process, always leads to the maintenance of an adaptive polymorphism, in a soft selection context. Although local mating does not alter the conditions for polymorphism maintenance, it is shown that, in that case, habitat selection also leads to the evolution of isolated reproductive units within each available habitat. Habitat selection, however, cannot evolve in the total absence of adaptive polymorphism. This represents a theoretical problem for all models assuming habitat selection to be an initially fixed trait, and means that within a soft selection framework, all the available habitats will be exploited, even the less favourable ones. On the other hand, polymorphism cannot be maintained when selection is hard, even when all individuals select their habitat. Here, the evolution of habitat selection does not need any prerequisite polymorphism, and always leads to the exploitation of only one habitat by the most specialized genotype. It appears then that hard selection can account for the existence of empty habitat and for an easier evolution of habitat specialization.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 198
页数:24
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Anderson S.S., McRea K.D., Abrahaon W.G., Hartzel L.M., Host genotype choice by the ball gallmaker Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera Tephritidae), Ecology, 70, pp. 1048-54, (1989)
[2]  
Anstensrud M., Schram T.A., Host and site selection by the larval stages and adults of the parasitic copepod Lernaeenicus sprattae (Sowerby)(Copepoda, Pennellidae) in the Oslofjord, Hydrobiologia, 167-168, pp. 587-95, (1988)
[3]  
Barton N., Clark A., Population structure and processes in evolution, Population Biology: Ecological and Evolutionary Viewpoints, pp. 115-73, (1990)
[4]  
Bush G.L., Sympatric speciation in phytophagous parasitic insects, Evolutionary Strategies of Parasitic Insects and Mites, pp. 187-204, (1975)
[5]  
Cavener D., Preference for ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster associated with the alcohol deshydrogenase polymorphism, Behavior. Genet., 9, pp. 359-65, (1979)
[6]  
Christensen B., Habitat preference among amylase genotypes in Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda, Crustacea, Hereditas, 87, pp. 21-6, (1977)
[7]  
De Meeus T., Renaud F., Gabrion C., A model for studying isolation mechanisms in parasite populations: the genus Lepeophtheirus (Copepoda, Caligidae), J. Exp. Zool., 254, pp. 207-14, (1990)
[8]  
Dempster E.R., Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity, Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. Sci., 20, pp. 25-32, (1955)
[9]  
Diehl S.R., Bush G.L., The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation, Speciation and its consequences, pp. 345-85, (1989)
[10]  
Doyle R.W., Settlement of planktonic larvae: a theory of habitat selection in varying environments, The American Naturalist, 109, pp. 113-26, (1975)