QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF ENZYME-ALTERED FOCI IN RAT HEPATOCARCINOGENESIS EXPERIMENTS .1. SINGLE AGENT REGIMEN

被引:99
作者
MOOLGAVKAR, SH
LUEBECK, EG
DEGUNST, M
PORT, RE
SCHWARZ, M
机构
[1] FREE UNIV AMSTERDAM,DEPT MATH,1081 HV AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[2] GERMAN CANC RES CTR,INST BIOCHEM,W-6900 HEIDELBERG,GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1093/carcin/11.8.1271
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Considerable recent attention has focused on the quantitative analysis of enzyme-altered foci in rodent hepatocarcinogenesis experiments. These foci are believed to represent clones premalignant cells. A method is presented for the quantitative analysis of these foci that takes into account both the total number of focal transections observed in each liver crosssection and the size distribution of these transections. The method, which has a natural interpretation within the framework of a two-mutation model for carcinogenesis, yields estimates of rates of initiation and of growth rates of enzyme-altered foci as functions of dose of the agent under consideration. Definitions of initiation and promotion potencies are proposed. The method is illustrated by application to an experiment in which rats were administered N-nitroso morpholine at various concentrations in their drinking water. © 1990 Oxford University Press.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1278
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, NUMERICAL RECIPES
[2]   APPLICATION OF QUANTITATIVE STEREOLOGY TO THE EVALUATION OF PHENOTYPICALLY HETEROGENEOUS ENZYME-ALTERED FOCI IN THE RAT-LIVER [J].
CAMPBELL, HA ;
XU, YD ;
HANIGAN, MH ;
PITOT, HC .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1986, 76 (04) :751-767
[3]   A STOCHASTIC 2-STAGE MODEL FOR CANCER RISK ASSESSMENT .2. THE NUMBER AND SIZE OF PREMALIGNANT CLONES [J].
DEWANJI, A ;
VENZON, DJ ;
MOOLGAVKAR, SH .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1989, 9 (02) :179-187
[4]   THE 1ST RELEVANT CELL STAGE IN RAT-LIVER CARCINOGENESIS - A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH [J].
EMMELOT, P ;
SCHERER, E .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1980, 605 (02) :247-304
[5]  
GOLDFARB S, 1981, CANCER RES, V41, P2092
[6]   MODELS OF HEPATOCARCINOGENESIS IN THE RAT - CONTRASTS AND COMPARISONS [J].
GOLDSWORTHY, TL ;
HANIGAN, MH ;
PITOT, HC .
CRC CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 1986, 17 (01) :61-89
[7]   MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF LIVER-CELL NUCLEI FROM OBSERVED DISTRIBUTION IN A PLANE SECTION [J].
KEIDING, N ;
JENSEN, ST ;
RANEK, L .
BIOMETRICS, 1972, 28 (03) :813-&
[9]   QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS OF CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS AND TUMOR PROMOTION IN LIVER [J].
KUNZ, HW ;
TENNEKES, HA ;
PORT, RE ;
SCHWARTZ, M ;
LORKE, D ;
SCHAUDE, G .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1983, 50 (APR) :113-122
[10]   A STOCHASTIC 2-STAGE MODEL FOR CANCER RISK ASSESSMENT .1. THE HAZARD FUNCTION AND THE PROBABILITY OF TUMOR [J].
MOOLGAVKAR, SH ;
DEWANJI, A ;
VENZON, DJ .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1988, 8 (03) :383-392