THALAMIC VPM NUCLEUS IN THE BEHAVING MONKEY .2. RESPONSE TO AIR-PUFF STIMULATION DURING DISCRIMINATION AND ATTENTION TASKS

被引:22
作者
TREMBLAY, N
BUSHNELL, MC
DUNCAN, GH
机构
[1] UNIV MONTREAL,FAC MED DENT,DEPT STOMATOL,CP 6128,SUCC A,MONTREAL H3C 3J7,QUEBEC,CANADA
[2] UNIV MONTREAL,CTR RECH SCI NEUROL,MONTREAL H3C 3J7,QUEBEC,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.1993.69.3.753
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
1. Single-unit activity was recorded in the ventral posterior medial (VPM) thalamic nucleus of awake monkeys while they performed detection and discrimination tasks involving tactile air-puff stimuli presented to the face. Neuronal responsiveness was compared directly with the monkey's discriminative performance. In addition, neuronal activity was compared when the monkey's attention was directed to the air-puff stimulus and when it was directed to a concurrent visual stimulus. 2. Neurons responding to the air-puff stimuli were classified as slowly adapting (SA), rapidly adapting (RA), inhibitory (IN), or multimodal (MM), according to their responses to manual and thermal stimulation, as well as their adaption rates to the air puff. Of 47 neurons responsive to air-puff stimulation and studied extensively in the behavioral task, 14 were classified as RA, 15 as SA, 6 as IN, and 12 as MM. The 12 MM neurons were so classified because, in addition to air puff, they responded to noxious heat, innocuous cooling, or noxious pinch. 3. Neurons from each class had restricted contralateral receptive fields localized within one division of the trigeminal nerve. There was no systematic difference in receptive-field size among groups. 4. A prominent difference in tactile responsiveness of MM neurons was response latency. Although the mean latency for RA, SA, and IN neurons was not significantly different (6.1, 9.1, and 12.2 ms, respectively), the mean latency for MM neurons was significantly longer than that for each of the other neuronal categories (28.8 ms; Ps < 0.001). These data suggest that the excitatory tactile afferent input to MM neurons is different from that to low-threshold neurons. 5. For RA, SA, and MM neurons the frequency of the neuronal discharge evoked by the air-puff stimulation was proportional to the intensity of the air puff. Thus responses of each neuronal class coded air-puff stimulus intensity. 6. The monkeys' ability to detect air-puff stimuli of various intensities was compared with the frequency of neuronal responses to those stimuli. Both the percent success in detecting differences in air-puff intensity and the detection latency were highly correlated with neuronal response frequency. The responses of all three excitatory neuronal categories corresponded well with the monkey's performance. Thus any or all of RA, SA, and MM neurons could play a role in the discrimination of air-puff intensities. 7. Attentional factors were studied by comparing air-puff-evoked responses when the monkey was required to attend to the air puffs and when it was required to attend to a concurrently presented light to receive reward. Only 2 of 23 neurons were significantly modulated by attentional state, and there was no systematic effect of attention on any neuronal category. 8. These data suggest that ventroposterior thalamus is important for discriminative aspects of tactile perception. Because RA, SA, and MM neurons all transmit discriminative information about stimulus intensity and location, each of these populations could subserve spatial and intensity discrimination. However, only SA and MM neurons provide sufficient information to subserve discrimination of stimulus duration, and the long latencies of MM neurons render them unsuitable for high-frequency resolution.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 763
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
BUSHNELL MC, 1987, EXP BRAIN RES, V67, P603
[2]   ACTIVITY OF TRIGEMINOTHALAMIC NEURONS IN MEDULLARY DORSAL HORN OF AWAKE MONKEYS TRAINED IN A THERMAL DISCRIMINATION TASK [J].
BUSHNELL, MC ;
DUNCAN, GH ;
DUBNER, R ;
HE, LF .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 52 (01) :170-187
[3]  
BUSHNELL MC, 1989, EXP BRAIN RES, V78, P415
[4]  
BUSHNELL MC, 1993, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V60
[6]   VENTRAL POSTERIOR THALAMIC NEURONS DIFFERENTIALLY RESPONSIVE TO NOXIOUS-STIMULATION OF THE AWAKE MONKEY [J].
CASEY, KL ;
MORROW, TJ .
SCIENCE, 1983, 221 (4611) :675-677
[7]   RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF NEURONS IN THE VENTRAL POSTERIOR LATERAL NUCLEUS OF THE MONKEY THALAMUS [J].
CHUNG, JM ;
LEE, KH ;
SURMEIER, DJ ;
SORKIN, LS ;
KIM, J ;
WILLIS, WD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 56 (02) :370-390
[8]  
Darian-Smith I, 1966, Int Rev Neurobiol, V9, P301, DOI 10.1016/S0074-7742(08)60141-5
[9]   CORTICAL PROJECTIONS OF THALAMIC NEURONES EXCITED BY MECHANICAL STIMULATION OF FACE OF CAT [J].
DARIANSMITH, I .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1964, 171 (02) :339-&
[10]   REGIONAL SEGREGATION OF NEURONS RESPONDING TO QUICKLY ADAPTING, SLOWLY ADAPTING, DEEP AND PACINIAN RECEPTORS WITHIN THALAMIC VENTROPOSTERIOR LATERAL AND VENTROPOSTERIOR INFERIOR NUCLEI IN THE SQUIRREL-MONKEY (SAIMIRI-SCIUREUS) [J].
DYKES, RW ;
SUR, M ;
MERZENICH, MM ;
KAAS, JH ;
NELSON, RJ .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1981, 6 (08) :1687-1692