EXPLOITATION ECOSYSTEMS IN HETEROGENEOUS HABITAT COMPLEXES .2. IMPACT OF SMALL-SCALE HETEROGENEITY ON PREDATOR PREY DYNAMICS

被引:45
作者
OKSANEN, T
OKSANEN, L
GYLLENBERG, M
机构
[1] Department of Animal Ecology, University of Umeå, Umeå
[2] Department of Ecological Botany, University of Umeå, Umeå
[3] Department of Applied Mathematics, Lulea University of Technology, Luleå
关键词
PATCH USE; PREDATION; PRODUCTIVITY; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; TROPHIC EXPLOITATION;
D O I
10.1007/BF02270699
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The model of exploitation ecosystems was re-analysed, assuming that habitat patches are so small that they form only parts of the home range of an individual predator. For habitat complexes where productive patches abound, the results suggested that predation will strongly spill over from productive patches, which set the tune for population dynamics within the whole landscape, to barren ones. This result conforms to the one obtained by T. Oksanen by assuming despotic habitat choice and essentially larger patch sizes. For habitat complexes heavily dominated by the barren habitat, spillover predation was predicted to be weak, as was the case in her large patch model. Unlike in her analysis, however, predation pressure was substantially reduced also within the productive habitat. In habitat complexes where patches are so small that they are exploited in a fine-grained manner, predation pressure was always found to be more intense in the barren habitat, contrary to the predictions of the original model of exploitation ecosystems. This analysis thus suggests that their model is applicable mainly on the landscape level. On the level of individual habitats, thc applicability of their results depends on the habitat configuration (at its best for the prevailing habitat of the landscape and for moderate-sized patches of an essentially more productive habitat) and generally decreases with decreasing patch sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 398
页数:16
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Brown J.S., Rosenzweig M.L., Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments, J. Theor. Biol., 123, pp. 151-71, (1986)
[2]  
Charnov E.L., Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem, Theor. Popul. Biol., 9, pp. 129-36, (1976)
[3]  
Debrot S., Mermod C., The spatial and temporal distribution pattern of the stoat (Mustela erminea L.), Oecologia, 59, pp. 69-73, (1983)
[4]  
Erlinge S., Distribution, territoriality and numbers of the weasel (Mustela nivalis) in relation to prey abundance, Oikos, 25, pp. 308-14, (1974)
[5]  
Erlinge S., Spacing strategy in stoat Mustela erminea, Oikos, 28, pp. 32-42, (1977)
[6]  
Fretwell S.D., Populations in a Seasonal Environment, (1972)
[7]  
Fretwell S.D., The regulation of plant communities by food chains exploiting them, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 20, pp. 169-85, (1977)
[8]  
Hairston N.G., Smith F.E., Slobodkin L.J., community structure, population control and competition, The American Naturalist, 94, pp. 421-5, (1960)
[9]  
Holt R.D., Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities, Theor. Popul. Biol., 12, pp. 197-229, (1977)
[10]  
Holt R.D., Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions and the coexistence of prey species, Am. Nat., 124, pp. 377-406, (1984)