THE SPECIFICITY OF IMAGING PROCEDURES (SONOGRAPHY, MRT, CT, ANGIO-CT, NUCLEAR-MEDICINE) FOR CHARACTERIZING LIVER-TUMORS

被引:21
作者
LUNING, M
KOCH, M
ABET, L
WOLFF, H
WENIG, B
BUCHALI, K
SCHOPKE, W
SCHNEIDER, T
MUHLER, A
RUDOLPH, B
机构
[1] HUMBOLDT UNIV, CHIRURG KLIN, O-1040 BERLIN, GERMANY
[2] HUMBOLDT UNIV, NUKL MED KLIN, O-1040 BERLIN, GERMANY
[3] HUMBOLDT UNIV, INST KARDIOVASK DIAGNOST, O-1040 BERLIN, GERMANY
[4] HUMBOLDT UNIV, INST PATHOL ANAT CHARITE, O-1040 BERLIN, GERMANY
来源
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 1991年 / 154卷 / 04期
关键词
CHARACTERIZATION; LIVER TUMORS; SONOGRAPHY; MRI; CT; ANGIO-CT; NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1055/s-2008-1033157
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In a prospective study, an attempt was made to determine the specificity of various imaging methods for defining tumours of the liver rather than their ability to demonstrate them. It was based on 130 patients with histologically confirmed lesions (33 haemangiomas, 17 FNH, 4 hepatocellular adenomas, 28 HCC, 36 adeno-carcinoma metastases). The methods were MRT (130 cases), sonography (119), CT (122), dynamic arterial angio-CT (15), TC-99-EHIDA or blood pool scintigraphy (4 FNH, haemangiomas, HCC, 44 cases). MRT showed somewhat better results (accuracy 80%) than CT (73%) and angio-CT (73%) in demonstrating the type of lesion. The results of scintigraphy (53%) and sonography (69%) were rather worse. The range of accuracy for MRT, CT and sonography varied from 94% (haemangiomas with MRT) to 47% (FNH with sonography).
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 406
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
BECKERGAAB C, 1987, DIGITALE BILDDIAGN, V7, P35
[2]  
BRECHTKRAUSS D, 1986, NUKLEARMED, V25, P114
[3]  
BROWN RKJ, 1987, J NUCL MED, V28, P1683
[4]  
CALVET X, 1988, J NUCL MED, V29, P1916
[5]   LIVER AND ABDOMINAL SCREENING IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER - CT VERSUS MR IMAGING [J].
CHEZMAR, JL ;
RUMANCIK, WM ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
HULNICK, DH ;
NELSON, RC ;
BERNARDINO, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (01) :43-47
[6]  
CLAUSSEN C, 1983, DYNAMISCHE COMPUTERT
[7]  
CREUTZIG H, 1986, NUKLEARMEDIZINER, V9, P353
[8]   ULTRASOUND, CT, AND MRI COMPARISON IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY TUMORS OF THE LIVER [J].
CURATI, WL ;
HALEVY, A ;
GIBSON, RN ;
CARR, DH ;
BLUMGART, LH ;
STEINER, RE .
GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1988, 13 (02) :123-128
[9]   EVALUATION OF FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MRI AND CT [J].
GLAZER, GM ;
AISEN, AM ;
FRANCIS, IR ;
GROSS, BH ;
GYVES, JW ;
ENSMINGER, WD .
GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1986, 11 (03) :263-268
[10]  
GORICH J, 1988, RADIOLOGE, V28, P349