HABITAT SELECTION BY CATTLE ALONG AN EPHEMERAL CHANNEL

被引:30
作者
SMITH, MA
RODGERS, JD
DODD, JL
SKINNER, QD
机构
来源
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT | 1992年 / 45卷 / 04期
关键词
SEASONAL; BIOMASS; UTILIZATION; PROTEIN; SUCCULENCE;
D O I
10.2307/4003088
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Because of widespread concern about cattle grazing effects on riparian zones of public lands, seasonal habitat selection by cattle was studied along a cold desert area ephemeral waterway of north-central Wyoming. Little is known of grazing effects on ephemeral streams compared to perennial streams. Cattle activity was monitored in small pastures and a surrounding large allotment in spring, summer, and fall. Observations included activity and habitat where it occurred. Concomitantly, utilization levels, protein content, and dry matter content of forages were determined in the small pastures. A higher percent of cattle selected channel and floodplain habitats than percent area of habitats while a lower percent of cattle selected upland habitat than percent of this habitat in the area. Utilization levels of forages except greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus (Hook.) Torrey) in the floodplain were not greatly different among habitats. Protein and dry matter content of forages did not vary greatly among habitats, except greasewood had higher protein and lower dry matter than other species and received much higher use. Forage quality declined in summer and fall. Animal preference for channel habitat was attributed to more available forage in the channels. In contrast, selection of floodplains was due to succulence and high protein content of greasewood. Comparison of cattle selectivity between small pastures ard the large allotment indicates that greater avoidance of upland areas by cattle is likely due to greater distances to drinking water in the large allotment.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 390
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
AMES CR, 1978, IMPORTANCE PRESERVAT, P39
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1975, OFFICIAL METHODS ANA
[3]  
ARNOLD G. W., 1960, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, V11, P1026, DOI 10.1071/AR9601026
[4]  
Arnold G. W., 1978, ETHOLOGY FREE RANGIN
[5]   STUDIES ON DIET OF GRAZING ANIMAL .I. SEASONAL CHANGES IN DIET OF SHEEP GRAZING ON PASTURES OF DIFFERENT AVAILABILITY AND COMPOSITION [J].
ARNOLD, GW ;
BALL, J ;
MCMANUS, WR ;
BUSH, IG .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1966, 17 (04) :543-+
[6]   NUTRITIVE VALUE OF FORAGE AND DIETS OF SHEEP AND CATTLE FROM OREGON SUBCLOVER-GRASS MIXTURES [J].
BEDELL, TE .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1971, 24 (02) :125-+
[7]  
BRYAN K, 1925, SCIENCE, V12, P328
[8]  
COOK C. WAYNE, 1966, J RANGE MANAGE, V19, P200, DOI 10.2307/3895647
[9]  
COOK CW, 1956, UTAH AGR EXP STA B, V385
[10]  
COWLISHAW S. J., 1960, JOUR AGRIC SCI, V54, P257, DOI 10.1017/S0021859600022437