A COMPARISON OF 5 DAYS OF DIRITHROMYCIN AND 7 DAYS OF CLARITHROMYCIN IN ACUTE BACTERIAL EXACERBATION OF CHRONIC-BRONCHITIS

被引:28
作者
HOSIE, J
QUINN, P
SMITS, P
SIDES, G
机构
[1] LILLY CORP CTR,LILLY RES LABS,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46285
[2] GREAT WESTERN MED,GLASGOW,LANARK,SCOTLAND
[3] CTR HLTH,SLIGO,IRELAND
[4] LILLY RES CTR LTD,WINDLESHAM GU20 6PH,SURREY,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/36.1.173
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The safety and efficacy of dirithromycin and clarithromycin were compared in a single-blind, multicentre study of patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Patients received either dirithromycin, 500 mg once daily for 5 days, or clarithromycin, 250 mg twice daily for 7 days. A total of 212 patients entered the study, of whom 191 qualified for efficacy analysis. Favourable post-therapy clinical and bacteriological response rates for qualified patients (95 dirithromycin and 96 clarithromycin) were similar: 89.5% and 68.8% for dirithromycin us 94.8% and 71.9% for clarithromycin. At late post-therapy evaluation, favourable clinical and bacteriological response rates were achieved in 98.8% and 96.2% of dirithromycin patients and 95.3% and 93.3% of clarithromycin patients, respectively. These differences were neither statistically nor clinically significantly different. Both drugs had similar efficacy against Haemophilus influenzae and both were well tolerated. Dirithromycin, administered as a single daily dose for just 5 days resulted in complete compliance in all but four patients. In clarithromycin-treated patients, requiring a 7-day course of twice-daily treatment, compliance was less satisfactory, with 12 patients failing to comply, though the between-group difference was not statistically significant. It can be concluded that 5 days of dirithromycin, 500 mg once daily is as safe and effective as 7 days of clarithromycin, 250 mg, twice daily in the treatment of AECB.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 183
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   TISSUE DISTRIBUTION OF DIRITHROMYCIN - COMPARISON WITH ERYTHROMYCIN [J].
BERGOGNEBEREZIN, E .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 :77-87
[2]  
CAZZOLA M, 1993, 6TH EUR C CLIN MICR
[4]  
GREENBERG RN, 1984, CLIN THER, V6, P592
[5]   COMPARATIVE INVITRO ACTIVITIES OF NEW 14-MEMBERED, 15-MEMBERED, AND 16-MEMBERED MACROLIDES [J].
HARDY, DJ ;
HENSEY, DM ;
BEYER, JM ;
VOJTKO, C ;
MCDONALD, EJ ;
FERNANDES, PB .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1988, 32 (11) :1710-1719
[6]   CLINICAL EFFICACY OF DIRITHROMYCIN IN PNEUMONIA [J].
JACOBSON, K .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 :121-129
[7]   CLINICAL EFFICACY OF DIRITHROMYCIN IN ACUTE EXACERBATIONS OF CHRONIC-BRONCHITIS [J].
SIDES, GD .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 :131-138
[8]   ERYTHROMYCIN - A MICROBIAL AND CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE AFTER 30 YEARS OF CLINICAL USE .2. [J].
WASHINGTON, JA ;
WILSON, WR .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1985, 60 (04) :271-278
[9]   COMPARISON OF MACROLIDE ANTIBIOTICS [J].
WILLIAMS, JD ;
SEFTON, AM .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 :11-26