INBREEDING AND FITNESS IN CAPTIVE POPULATIONS - LESSONS FROM DROSOPHILA

被引:43
作者
MILLER, PS
HEDRICK, PW
机构
[1] Department of Zoology, Arizona State University, Tempe
关键词
CAPTIVE BREEDING; GENETIC VARIATION; MALE-MATING ABILITY; REINTRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1002/zoo.1430120404
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The avoidance of inbreeding is a primary goal of endangered species population management. In order to fully understand the effects of inbreeding on the fitness of natural and captive populations, it is necessary to consider fitness components which span the entire life cycle of the organism. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for conservation genetics studies, we constructed 18 experimental lines derived from wild-type stocks which were homozygous for chromosome 2 (this chromosome constitutes 38% of the genome or is equivalent to F = 0.38). For six of these lines which exhibited a reduced homozygous fitness, we estimated the relative values of fitness components operating at both the juvenile stage (pre-adult viability) and adult stage (female fecundity and male-mating ability) of the life cycle. Males in these lines showed a markedly reduced mating ability, while viability and female fecundity were much less affected. Equilibrium values of the wild-type chromosomes in these lines were accurately predicted using a model that incorporated into it these independently estimated fitness components. These results emphasize the importance of studying all fitness components directly to determine overall fitness. A reduced mating ability among inbred males of a captive population can have serious consequences for its future sustainability, and can further jeopardize reintroduction efforts; consequently, a program to carefully monitor the reproductive success of individual males, as well as other fitness components, is recommended. (C) 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 351
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Ballou J.D., Ralls K., Inbreeding and juvenile mortality in small populations of ungulates: a detailed analysis, Biological Conservation, 24, pp. 239-272, (1982)
[2]  
Bijlsma-Meeles E., Bijlsma R., The alcohol de‐hydrogenase polymorphism in Drosophila mela‐nogaster: fitness measurements and predictions under conditions with no alcohol stress, Genetics, 120, pp. 743-753, (1988)
[3]  
Borlase S.C., Loebel D.A., Frankham R., Nur-then R.K., Briscoe D.A., Daggard G., Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: consequences of equalization of family size, Conservation Biology, 7, pp. 122-131, (1993)
[4]  
Brewer B.A., Lacy R.C., Foster M.L., Alaks G., Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice, Journal of Heredity, 81, pp. 257-266, (1990)
[5]  
Briscoe D.A., Malpica J.M., Robertson A., Smith G.J., Frankham R., Banks R.G., Barker J.S.F., Loss of genetic variation in large laboratory populations of Drosophila flies: implications for the genetic management of captive populations, Conservation Biology, 6, pp. 416-425, (1992)
[6]  
Brittnacher J.G., Genetic variation and genetic load due to the male reproductive component of fitness in Drosophila, Genetics, 97, pp. 719-730, (1981)
[7]  
Bundgaard J., Christiansen F.B., Dynamics of polymorphisms: I. Selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melano‐gaster, Genetics, 71, pp. 439-460, (1972)
[8]  
Clark A.G., Causes and consequences of variation in lipid and carbohydrate storage in Drosophila, Genetics, 123, pp. 131-144, (1989)
[9]  
Dobzhansky T., Spassky B., Genetics of natural populations XXXIV. Adaptive norm, genetic load, and genetic elite in Drosophila pseudoob‐scura, Genetics, 48, pp. 1467-1485, (1963)
[10]  
Falconer D.S., Introduction To Quantitative Genetics, (1989)