Space Syntax and Walking in a New Urbanist and Suburban Neighbourhoods

被引:167
作者
Baran, Perver K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rodriguez, Daniel A. [4 ]
Khattak, Asad J. [5 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Ctr Earth Observ, 5120 Jordan Hall,Box 7106, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Design Program, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Old Domin Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Norfolk, VA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/13574800701803498
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Prevailing measures of street design have largely ignored the relational properties between local and global street design as correlates of walking behaviour. This study contributes to understanding relationships between the syntactical properties of street design and walking behaviour by examining whether space syntax measures in New Urbanist and conventional suburban neighbourhoods are associated with the walking patterns of residents in these communities. Relying on geographic information systems, survey data and travel diaries, the study relates control, local integration and global integration to walking behaviour, while adjusting for the effect of individual-and household-level characteristics. It finds significant relationships between the number of leisure trips and all three syntactical measures. It also finds a consistent positive relationship between total utilitarian walking and two of the space syntax variables, control and global integration. By explaining individuals' walking behaviour using relational measures of street design, urban designers and planners are encouraged to expand their consideration of how street design may influence walking beyond the local purview.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 28
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, P 3 INT SPAC SYNT S
[2]  
Baran P. K., 2006, 37 ENV DES RES ASS C
[3]   Greening development to protect watersheds - Does new urbanism make a difference? [J].
Berke, PR ;
MacDonald, J ;
White, N ;
Holmes, M ;
Line, D ;
Oury, K ;
Ryznar, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2003, 69 (04) :397-413
[4]  
Boarnet M. G., 2001, TRAVEL DESIGN INFLUE
[5]  
Boarnet MG, 2000, TRANSPORT RES REC, P27
[6]   Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics [J].
Boarnet, MG ;
Sarmiento, S .
URBAN STUDIES, 1998, 35 (07) :1155-1169
[7]  
Bookout L. W., 1992, URBAN LAND, V51, P10
[8]   New urban and standard suburban subdivisions - Evaluating psychological and social goals [J].
Brown, BB ;
Cropper, VL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2001, 67 (04) :402-419
[9]  
Cameron AC., 2013, REGRESSION ANAL COUN
[10]   COMMUTING IN TRANSIT VERSUS AUTOMOBILE NEIGHBORHOODS [J].
CERVERO, R ;
GORHAM, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1995, 61 (02) :210-225