THE APPROPRIATENESS OF ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE AND MULTIPLE-COMPARISON PROCEDURES

[1] BAKER RJ, 1980, CAN J PLANT SCI, V60, P325

[2] CHEW V, 1976, HORTSCIENCE, V11, P348

[3] FEDERER WALTER T., 1961, PROC AMER SOC HORT SCI, V78, P605

[4] Fisher R.A., 1960, DESIGN EXPT, V7th

[5] LITTLE TM, 1978, HORTSCIENCE, V13, P504

[6] REVIEW OF RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY FROM A BIOMETRIC VIEWPOINT [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1975, 31 (04) : 803 - 851

[7] MORSE PM, 1981, CAN J PLANT SCI, V61, P799

[8] ONEILL R, 1971, J R STAT SOC B, V33, P218

[9] USE AND MISUSE OF MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1977, 69 (02) : 205 - 208

[10] Victor C, 1976, P FLA STATE HORTIC S, V89, P251

[1] BAKER RJ, 1980, CAN J PLANT SCI, V60, P325

[2] CHEW V, 1976, HORTSCIENCE, V11, P348

[3] FEDERER WALTER T., 1961, PROC AMER SOC HORT SCI, V78, P605

[4] Fisher R.A., 1960, DESIGN EXPT, V7th

[5] LITTLE TM, 1978, HORTSCIENCE, V13, P504

[6] REVIEW OF RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY FROM A BIOMETRIC VIEWPOINT [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1975, 31 (04) : 803 - 851

[7] MORSE PM, 1981, CAN J PLANT SCI, V61, P799

[8] ONEILL R, 1971, J R STAT SOC B, V33, P218

[9] USE AND MISUSE OF MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1977, 69 (02) : 205 - 208

[10] Victor C, 1976, P FLA STATE HORTIC S, V89, P251