ETHICAL ISSUES IN OBSERVATIONAL FAMILY RESEARCH

被引：3

作者：

BUSSELL, DA

机构：

[1] Center for Family Research, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, 20037, 2300 Eye Street, N.W., Ross Hall

来源：

FAMILY PROCESS | 1994年 / 33卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00361.x

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

Ethical issues raised by the increasing reliance on observational technology in family research are discussed. The tensions between scientific advancement and participant welfare are highlighted by delineating the process of observational research and the nature of the relationship between family scientists and the families they study. Guidelines are proposed for ethical decision making regarding potential child abuse, suicidality, informed consent, confidentiality, and debriefing.

引用

页码：361 / 376

页数：16

共 28 条

[1]

*AM PSYCH ASS, 1982, ETH PRINC COND RES H

[2] TARASOFF AND THE RESEARCHER - DOES THE DUTY TO PROTECT APPLY IN THE RESEARCH SETTING [J].

APPELBAUM, PS ;

ROSENBAUM, A .

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 44 (06) :885-894

[3]

BANK L, 1990, ADV FAM RES, P247

[4]

BEAUCHAMP TL, 1989, CONT ISSUES BIOETHIC

[5]

BLANCK PD, 1992, AM PSYCHOL, V47, P959

[6]

BORUCH RF, 1979, ASSURING CONFIDENTIA

[7]

BUSSELL DA, 1993, NORMAL FAMILY PROCES, P161

[8] LIABILITY IN CHILD THERAPY AND RESEARCH [J].

DEKRAAI, MB ;

SALES, BD .

JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 59 (06) :853-860

[9] CAN CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA PAY OFF [J].

ESPOSITO, JL ;

AGARD, E ;

ROSNOW, RL .

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1984, 5 (04) :477-480

[10] STANDARDS IN RESEARCH - APAS MECHANISM FOR MONITORING THE CHALLENGES [J].

GRISSO, T ;

BALDWIN, E ;

BLANCK, PD ;

ROTHERAMBORUS, MJ ;

SCHOOLER, NR ;

THOMPSON, T .

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 46 (07) :758-766

← 1 2 3 →