MATHEMATICAL-MODEL FOR REPAIR OF FATIGUE DAMAGE AND STRESS-FRACTURE IN OSTEONAL BONE

被引:101
作者
MARTIN, B [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF DAVIS, ORTHOPAED RES LABS, DAVIS, CA 95616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jor.1100130303
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper assembles current concepts about bone fatigue and osteonal remodeling into a mathematical theory of the repair of fatigue damage and the etiology of stress fracture. The model was used to address three questions. (a) How does the half-life of fatigue damage compare with the duration of the remodeling cycle? (b) Does the porosity associated with the remodeling response contribute to stress fracture? (c) To what extent is a periosteal callus response necessary to augment repair by remodeling? To develop the theory, existing experimental data were used to formulate mathematical relationships between loading, damage, periosteal bone formation, osteonal remodeling, porosity, and elastic modulus. The resulting nonlinear relationships were numerically solved in an iterative fashion using a computer, and the behavior of the model was studied for various loading conditions and values of system parameters. The model adapted to increased loading by increasing remodeling to repair the additional damage and by adding new bone periosteally to reduce strain. However, if too much loading was encountered, the porosity associated with increased remodeling caused the system to become unstable; i.e., damage, porosity, and strain increased at a very high rate and without limit. It is proposed that this phenomenon is the equivalent of a stress fracture and that its biological and mechanical elements are significant in the etiology of stress fractures. Additional experiments must be done to test the model and provide better values for its parameters. However, the instability characteristic is relatively insensitive to changes in model parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 316
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Anderson C, Danylchuk KD, Bone‐remodeling rates of the beagle: a comparison between different sites on the same rib, Am J Vet Res, 39, pp. 1763-1765, (1978)
[2]  
Beaupre GS, Orr TE, Carter DR, An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—theoretical development, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 8, pp. 651-661, (1990)
[3]  
Burr DB, Martin RB, Schaffler MB, Radin EL, Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage, J Biomech, 18, pp. 189-200, (1985)
[4]  
Burr DB, Milgrom C, Boyd RD, Higgins WL, Robin G, Radin EL, Experimental stress fractures of the tibia: biological and mechanical aetiology in rabbits, J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 72, pp. 370-375, (1990)
[5]  
Burr DB, Stafford T, Validity of the bulk‐staining technique to separate artifactual from in vivo bone microdamage, Clin Orthop, 260, pp. 305-308, (1990)
[6]  
Burr DB, Martin RB, Calculating the probability that microcracks initiate resorption spaces, J Biomech, 26, pp. 613-616, (1993)
[7]  
Caler WE, Carter DR, Bone creep‐fatigue damage accumulation, J Biomech, 22, pp. 625-635, (1989)
[8]  
Carter DR, Hayes WC, Compact bone fatigue damage: a microscopic examination, Clin Orthop, 127, pp. 265-274, (1977)
[9]  
Carter D, Caler WE, Spengler DM, Frankel VH, Fatigue behavior of adult cortical bone: the influence of mean strain and strain range, Acta Orthop Scand, 52, pp. 481-490, (1981)
[10]  
Carter DR, Caler WE, Cycle‐dependent and time‐dependent bone fracture with repeated loading, J Biomech Eng, 105, pp. 166-170, (1983)