NEIGHBORHOOD SIZE AND NEIGHBORHOOD FREQUENCY-EFFECTS IN WORD RECOGNITION

被引:189
作者
SEARS, CR
HINO, Y
LUPKER, SJ
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.876
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
What are the effects of a word's orthographic neighborhood on the word recognition process? Andrews (1989) reported that large neighborhoods facilitate lexical access (the neighborhood size effect). Grainger, O'Regan, Jacobs, & Segui (1989) reported that higher frequency neighbors inhibit lexical access (the ''neighborhood frequency effect''). Because neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency typically covary (words with large neighborhoods will usually possess higher frequency neighbors), these findings would seem to contradict one another. In the present study, 6 experiments on the effects of neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency indicated that, at least for low-frequency words, large neighborhoods do facilitate processing. However, the existence of higher frequency neighbors seems to facilitate rather than inhibit processing. The implications of these findings for serial and parallel models of lexical access are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 900
页数:25
相关论文
共 25 条
[2]   FREQUENCY AND NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS ON LEXICAL ACCESS - LEXICAL SIMILARITY OR ORTHOGRAPHIC REDUNDANCY [J].
ANDREWS, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1992, 18 (02) :234-254
[3]   ARE LEXICAL DECISIONS A GOOD MEASURE OF LEXICAL ACCESS - THE ROLE OF WORD-FREQUENCY IN THE NEGLECTED DECISION STAGE [J].
BALOTA, DA ;
CHUMBLEY, JI .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1984, 10 (03) :340-357
[4]   ALLOCATION OF ATTENTION DURING VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION [J].
BECKER, CA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1976, 2 (04) :556-566
[5]   ON THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CONNECTIONISM AND DATA - ARE A FEW WORDS NECESSARY [J].
BESNER, D ;
TWILLEY, L ;
MCCANN, RS ;
SEERGOBIN, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (03) :432-446
[6]  
Coltheart M., 1977, ATTENTION PERFORM, P535, DOI DOI 10.1006/BRLN.2001.2475
[7]  
FERA P, 1992, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V18, P749
[8]  
Forster K., 1976, NEW APPROACHES LANGU, P257
[9]   RESOLVING 20 YEARS OF INCONSISTENT INTERACTIONS BETWEEN LEXICAL FAMILIARITY AND ORTHOGRAPHY, CONCRETENESS, AND POLYSEMY [J].
GERNSBACHER, MA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1984, 113 (02) :256-281
[10]   SUBJECTIVE FREQUENCY AND THE LEXICAL DECISION LATENCY FUNCTION - IMPLICATIONS FOR MECHANISMS OF LEXICAL ACCESS [J].
GORDON, B .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 24 (06) :631-645