CERVICAL-CANCER SCREENING - ATTENDANCE AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS

被引:54
作者
KOOPMANSCHAP, MA
VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ
VANAGT, HMA
VANBALLEGOOIJEN, M
HABBEMA, JDF
LUBBE, KTN
机构
[1] Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus University, Rotterdam
关键词
D O I
10.1002/ijc.2910450305
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The influence of attendance on the health effects and cost‐effectiveness of cervical‐cancer screening was studied, both for organized screening programmes and for spontaneous screening. The asymmetric distribution of smears among the female population and the higher risk incurred by women who never or only occasionally attend screening appear crucial in determining the health effects of screening. An increase in attendance rate induces a substantial rise in health effects and a less than proportionate rise in costs, thus improving cost‐effectiveness. Wider screening coverage, in order to increase the number of life‐years saved, is achieved more efficiently by encouraging a greater number of women to attend than by inviting the same number of women to attend more often, i.e., with a shorter interval between successive screens. Spontaneous screening is characterized by high coverage for younger women and low coverage for middle‐aged and older women. This leads to a small amount of health effects and poor cost‐effectiveness as compared with organized screening. Copyright © 1990 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 415
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] ORGANIZATION AND RESULTS OF THE CERVICAL CYTOLOGY SCREENING-PROGRAM IN BRITISH-COLUMBIA, 1955-85
    ANDERSON, GH
    BOYES, DA
    BENEDET, JL
    LERICHE, JC
    MATISIC, JP
    SUEN, KC
    WORTH, AJ
    MILLNER, A
    BENNETT, OM
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 296 (6627): : 975 - 978
  • [2] CERVICAL CYTOLOGY IN WESTERN-AUSTRALIA - FREQUENCY, GEOGRAPHICAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC DISTRIBUTIONS AND PROVIDERS OF THE SERVICE
    ARMSTRONG, BK
    ROUSE, IL
    BUTLER, TL
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1986, 144 (05) : 239 - +
  • [3] BERGET A, 1979, DAN MED BULL, V26, P91
  • [4] STUDY OF WOMEN WHO DID NOT RESPOND TO SCREENING FOR CERVICAL-CANCER
    BERRINO, F
    CHIAPPA, L
    OLIVERIO, S
    TODESCHIN, P
    TUROLLA, E
    VEGETTI, P
    [J]. TUMORI, 1979, 65 (02) : 143 - 155
  • [5] BOYES DA, 1982, CLIN INVEST MED, V5, P1
  • [6] RESPONSE TO A MOBILE CERVICAL SCREENING UNIT IN AN INDUSTRIAL AREA OF ENGLAND
    BRINDLE, G
    HIGHAM, E
    ROBERTS, DJ
    WAKEFIELD, J
    YULE, R
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 1976, 90 (04) : 165 - 169
  • [7] Choi N W, 1986, IARC Sci Publ, P61
  • [8] DRAPER GJ, 1982, BR J FAM PLANN, V8, P95
  • [9] ATTENDANCE FOR CERVICAL SCREENING - WHOSE PROBLEM
    EARDLEY, A
    ELKIND, AK
    SPENCER, B
    HOBBS, P
    PENDLETON, LL
    HARAN, D
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1985, 20 (09) : 955 - 962
  • [10] EBELING K, 1986, IARC SCI PUBL, V76, P251