MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES IN ORDER TO PROMOTE KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL INNOVATION

被引:8
作者
Jimenez-Jimenez, Daniel [1 ]
Sanz-Valle, Raquel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Management, Murcia, Spain
关键词
HRM; Knowledge management; Technical innovation; Structural equation modelling;
D O I
10.2753/JMR1536-5433050202
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Recent literature has highlighted the importance of human resource management, knowledge management, and technical innovation as key elements for achieving competitive advantage. Furthermore, research has shown a positive relationship between these three variables. However, empirical research on this issue is still scarce. This paper analyzes those linkages using structural equation modeling with data collected from 373 Spanish firms. The findings show that there is a relationship among the variables, although it is more complex than described in previous studies.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 100
页数:18
相关论文
共 184 条
[1]  
Ahmed PK, 1999, TOTAL QUAL MANAGE, V10, pS426
[2]   ORGANIZATIONAL-STRUCTURE, WORK PROCESS, AND PROPOSAL MAKING IN ADMINISTRATIVE BUREAUCRACIES [J].
AIKEN, M ;
BACHARACH, SB ;
FRENCH, JL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1980, 23 (04) :631-652
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HUM RESO PLANN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, J HIGH TECHNOLOGY MA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, OSL MAN
[8]  
Appelbaum S.H., 1998, J WORKPLACE LEARN, V10, P15, DOI [10.1108/13665629810370012, DOI 10.1108/13665629810370012]
[9]   THE LINK BETWEEN BUSINESS STRATEGY AND INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS SYSTEMS IN AMERICAN STEEL MINIMILLS [J].
ARTHUR, JB .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1992, 45 (03) :488-506
[10]   Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas [J].
Axtell, CM ;
Holman, DJ ;
Unsworth, KL ;
Wall, TD ;
Waterson, PE .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 73 :265-285