PATIENT DESIRE FOR INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING IN HEALTH-CARE DECISIONS - THE AUTONOMY PREFERENCE INDEX AND THE HEALTH OPINION SURVEY

被引：102

作者：

NEASE, RF ^{[1
]}

BROOKS, WB ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] DARTMOUTH COLL,HITCHCOCK MED CTR,DEPT MED,LEBANON,NH 03756

来源：

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE | 1995年 / 10卷 / 11期

关键词：

AUTONOMY; DECISION MAKING; PATIENT-CENTERED DECISION MAKING; AUTONOMY PREFERENCE INDEX; HEALTH OPINION SURVEY;

D O I：

10.1007/BF02602742

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

OBJECTIVES: To compare results on the Autonomy Preference Index (API) and the Health Opinion Survey (HOS), two instruments that measure patient desire for information and involvement in decision making, DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: University-based primary care outpatient longitudinal and acute care clinic. PATIENTS: 167 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, back pain, or mild hypertension seen from October 1991 to December 1992. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On the API and the HOS (both scaled from 0 to 1), the patients had intermediate desire for involvement in decision making (median API: 0.42; HOS: 0.36) and higher desire for information (median API: 0.97; HOS: 0.57). With either instrument, the desire for information exceeded that for involvement in decision making (p < 0.0001). The API information scores were higher than the HOS information scores (p < 0.0001), probably because the HOS focuses on patient behavior rather than desire, Variation in desire for information and involvement in decision making was substantial and largely unexplained. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients have a high desire for information, the desire for information and involvement in decision making varies substantially among patients, and the API is preferable to the HOS for researchers interested in focusing solely on patient desire for information.

引用

页码：593 / 600

页数：8

共 28 条

[1]

Barry M.J., Mulley A.G., Fowler F.J., Wennberg J.E., Watchful waiting versus immediate transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatism, JAMA, 259, (1988)

[2]

Mulley A.G., Assessing patients’ utilities: can the ends justify the means?, Med Care, 27, (1989)

[3]

Nease R., Kneeland T., O'Connor G., Sox H., Sumner W., Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina. Implications for clinical practice guidelines, JAMA, 273, (1995)

[4]

Fowler F.J., Wennberg J.E., Timothy R.P., Barry M.J., Mulley A.G., Hanley D., Symptom status and quality of life following prostatectomy, JAMA, 259, (1988)

[5]

Greenfield S., Kaplan S., Ware J.E., Expanding patient involvement in care, Ann Intern Med, 102, (1985)

[6]

Orth J.E., Stiles W.B., Patient exposition and provider explanation in routine interviews and hypertensive patients’ blood pressure control, Health Psychol, 6, pp. 29-42, (1987)

[7]

Greenfield S., Kaplan S.H., Ware J.E., Yano E.M., Frank H.J., Patients’ participation in medical care. Blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes, J Gen Intern Med, 3, (1988)

[8]

Kaplan S.H., Greenfield S., Ware J.E., Assessing the effects of physician—patient interactions in the outcomes of chronic disease, Med Care, 27, (1989)

[9]

Christenson A.J., Smith T.W., Turner C.W., Holman J.M., Gregory M.C., Type of hemodialysis and preferences for behavioral involvement: interactive effects on adherence in end-stage renal disease, Health Psychol, 9, (1990)

[10]

Mahler H.I.M., Kulik J.A., Health care involvement preferences and social-emotional recovery of male coronary artery bypass patients, Health Psychol, 10, pp. 399-408, (1991)

← 1 2 3 →