RESPONSES OF 2 TROPHIC LEVELS TO PATCH ENRICHMENT ALONG A NEW-ZEALAND STREAM CONTINUUM

被引:49
作者
BIGGS, BJF
LOWE, RL
机构
[1] NIWA-Ecosystems, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd., Christchurch
[2] Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH
关键词
PERIPHYTON; STREAM ECOLOGY; INVERTEBRATE GRAZERS; TROPHIC LEVELS; PATCH DYNAMICS; NUTRIENTS; TOP-DOWN CONTROL; BOTTOM-UP CONTROL;
D O I
10.1080/00288330.1994.9516601
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
We carried out a benthic survey and two experiments in runs at eight sites down the Kakanui River (South Island, New Zealand) during summer low flows, to investigate the interaction between nutrients, periphyton, and macro-grazers. Benthic periphytic biomass was generally low (< 20 mg m-2 chlorophyll a) at most sites, but high densities of macro-grazers (mainly snails) were observed at six of the eight sites. Chlorophyll a and cellular P concentrations were generally higher on artificial substrates in the first- to third-order tributaries, compared with downstream. Macro-grazer densities (mainly snails) were also highest in the second- and third-order tributaries. Enrichment of patches with N and P did not translate into significant increases in chlorophyll a concentrations. Instead there was a general increase in macro-grazers, and an increase in the relative abundance of Cocconeis placentula. In a second experiment, the chlorophyll a level was five-fold higher on the substrates where macro-grazers were excluded and there was Do significant response of chlorophyll a to nutrient addition on these substrates. On the grazed substrates, densities of snails and caddis-larvae were two-fold higher with N+P enrichment. These experiments provided evidence for a tight coupling between first and second trophic levels, and strong grazer control of periphyton, in this river.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 134
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Auer M.T., Canale R.P., Ecological studies and mathematical modelling of Cladophora in Lake Huron: 3. The dependence of growth rates on internal phosphorus pool size, Journal of Great Lakes Research, 8, pp. 93-99, (1982)
  • [2] Biggs B., Effects of sample storage and mechanical blending on the quantitative analysis of river periphyton, Freshwater Biology, 18, pp. 197-203, (1987)
  • [3] Biggs B., Periphyton communities and their environments in New Zealand rivers, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24, pp. 367-386, (1990)
  • [4] Biggs B., Close M.E., Periphyton biomass dynamics in gravel bed rivers: The relative effects of flows and nutrients, Freshwater Biology, 22, pp. 209-231, (1989)
  • [5] Biggs B., Duncan M.J., Jowett I.G., Quinn J.M., Hickey C.W., Davies-Colley R.J., Close M.E., Ecological characterisation, classification, and modelling of New Zealand rivers: An introduction and synthesis, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24, pp. 277-304, (1990)
  • [6] Bothwell M.L., Phosphorus limitation of lode periphyton growth rates: An intersite comparison using continuous-flow troughs (Thompson River System, British Columbia), Limnology and Oceanography, 30, pp. 527-542, (1985)
  • [7] Crowl T.A., Schnell G.D., Factors determining population density and size distribution of a freshwater snail in streams: Effects on periphyton and invertebrate succession, Oikos, 59, pp. 359-367, (1991)
  • [8] Denicola D.M., McLntire C.D., Effects of hydraulic refuge and irradiance on grazerperiphyton interaction in laboratory streams, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 10, pp. 251-262, (1991)
  • [9] Fairchild G.W., Lowe R.L., Artificial substrates which release nutrients: Effects on periphyton and invertebrate succession, Hydrobiologia, 114, pp. 29-37, (1984)
  • [10] Feminella J.W., Power M.E., Resh V.H., Periphyton responses to invertebrate grazing and riparian canopy in three northern California coastal streams, Freshwater Biology, 22, pp. 445-475, (1989)