TOMOGRAPHIC INVERSION IN REFLECTION SEISMOLOGY

被引:75
作者
WILLIAMSON, PR
机构
[1] UNIV CAMBRIDGE,CAMBRIDGE,ENGLAND
[2] AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,CANBERRA,ACT 2600,AUSTRALIA
关键词
inversion; reflection tomography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-246X.1990.tb02484.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Recently there has been much interest in performing tomographic inversion on data acquired in seismic reflection configurations. Several approaches to dealing with the unknown geometry of reflectors have evolved, the most natural of which seems to be to parametrize them in a manner consistent with the velocity field discretization. the inversion may then be formulated to treat both sets of parameters equally, avoiding the possibility of in‐built bias. One appropriate formulation may be a least‐squares optimization with a priori and step‐length damping terms, which may be accomplished by a multiple‐parameter class subspace method. Unfortunately a standard, ‘naive’ application of such an optimization method appears to fall foul of trade‐offs between reflector depth and near‐reflector velocities. These are manifested in the poor reconstruction of the lower portion of test models from synthetic data. Considerations of determinacy, strategies for non‐linear problems and regularization inspired the idea of a multiple‐stage approach, in which successive stages admit progressively shorter scale lengths of variation in both velocity field and reflector. an algorithm implementing this approach demonstrates a significant improvement in the reconstruction of longer‐wavelength components of test models. However the tests also suggest that the shorter‐wavelength velocity‐depth trade‐offs at the reflector are unresolvable without further information. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 274
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1987, INVERSE PROBLEM THEO
  • [2] UNIQUENESS IN INVERSION OF INACCURATE GROSS EARTH DATA
    BACKUS, G
    GILBERT, F
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1970, 266 (1173) : 123 - &
  • [3] TOMOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF VELOCITY AND DEPTH IN LATERALLY VARYING MEDIA
    BISHOP, TN
    BUBE, KP
    CUTLER, RT
    LANGAN, RT
    LOVE, PL
    RESNICK, JR
    SHUEY, RT
    SPINDLER, DA
    WYLD, HW
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 1985, 50 (06) : 903 - 923
  • [4] Bois P., 1971, Geophysical Prospecting, V19, P42, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1971.tb00585.x
  • [5] APPLICATIONS OF SEISMIC TRAVEL-TIME TOMOGRAPHY
    BORDING, RP
    GERSZTENKORN, A
    LINES, LR
    SCALES, JA
    TREITEL, S
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 90 (02): : 285 - &
  • [6] 3-DIMENSIONAL DETERMINATION OF STRUCTURE AND VELOCITY BY SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY
    CHIU, SKL
    KANASEWICH, ER
    PHADKE, S
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 1986, 51 (08) : 1559 - 1571
  • [7] CRUSTAL STRUCTURE MODELING OF EARTHQUAKE DATA .1. SIMULTANEOUS LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION OF HYPOCENTER AND VELOCITY PARAMETERS
    CROSSON, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1976, 81 (17): : 3036 - 3046
  • [8] RECONSTRUCTION OF 3 DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE FROM PROJECTIONS AND ITS APPLICATION TO ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
    CROWTHER, RA
    DEROSIER, DJ
    KLUG, A
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1970, 317 (1530): : 319 - &
  • [9] Deans S., 1983, RADON TRANSFORM SOME
  • [10] COMPUTERIZED GEOPHYSICAL TOMOGRAPHY
    DINES, KA
    LYTLE, RJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1979, 67 (07) : 1065 - 1073