EVOKED-POTENTIAL TOPOGRAPHY IN MAJOR DEPRESSION .1. COMPARISONS WITH NONPATIENTS AND SCHIZOPHRENICS

This study compared evoked potential (EP) topography in major depression (MD), schizophrenia and nonpatient controls. EPs to four kinds of stimuli were recorded from 15 locations. Patients were 69 MDs and 52 schizophrenics, currently unmedicated. EP waveforms of 195 controls were subjected to principal component factor analysis (PCA). The structures of 32 factors so extracted have been shown to encompass the data space of disparate groups; they were used to compute factor scores for all subjects. Age- and gender-matched groups were compared. Factor scores were normalized across leads (Z-transform) to distinguish between topographic and mean level differences. Topographic differences (P < 0.05) between MD and controls were demonstrated for scores of 8 factors, with 2 others at P = 0.053. Unlike those for schizophrenia/ control comparisons, these topographic differences did not converge regionally in MD. EP findings were not related to duration of withdrawal from drugs. There were few differences between bipolar and unipolar patients. Topographies of 5 factors differed between MDs and schizophrenics; these involved all modalities and reflected long latency, cognition-related events, such as P300. These topographic differences were antero-posterior (AP); values were greater posteriorly in MDs and anteriorly in schizophrenics. Deviant AP gradients appear specific to MD; gradients were similar in schizophrenics and controls.