STATUS CONGRUENCE AND EXPECTATIONS

[1] STATUS CONGRUENCY AS A VARIABLE IN SMALL GROUP PERFORMANCE [J]. SOCIAL FORCES, 1953, 32 (01) : 16 - 22

[2] BRANDON AC, 1964, THESIS U CALIFORNIA

[3] STATUS CONGRUENCY AND INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT IN DECISION-MAKING GROUPS [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1959, 12 (02) : 147 - 161

[4] HOMANS GC, 1961, SOCIAL BEHAVIOR ITS

[5] STATUS CONSISTENCY AND SYMPTOMS OF STRESS [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1962, 27 (04) : 469 - 480

[6] LENSKI GE, 1956, AM SOCIOL REV, V21, P458, DOI DOI 10.2307/2088714

[7] STATUS CRYSTALLIZATION: A NON-VERTICAL DIMENSION OF SOCIAL STATUS [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1954, 19 (04) : 405 - 413

[8] STATUS CONGRUENCE AND COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY [J]. SOCIOMETRY, 1963, 26 (02): : 146 - 162

[9] Zaleznik A., 1958, MOTIVATION PRODUCTIV

[1] STATUS CONGRUENCY AS A VARIABLE IN SMALL GROUP PERFORMANCE [J]. SOCIAL FORCES, 1953, 32 (01) : 16 - 22

[2] BRANDON AC, 1964, THESIS U CALIFORNIA

[3] STATUS CONGRUENCY AND INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT IN DECISION-MAKING GROUPS [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1959, 12 (02) : 147 - 161

[4] HOMANS GC, 1961, SOCIAL BEHAVIOR ITS

[5] STATUS CONSISTENCY AND SYMPTOMS OF STRESS [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1962, 27 (04) : 469 - 480

[6] LENSKI GE, 1956, AM SOCIOL REV, V21, P458, DOI DOI 10.2307/2088714

[7] STATUS CRYSTALLIZATION: A NON-VERTICAL DIMENSION OF SOCIAL STATUS [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1954, 19 (04) : 405 - 413

[8] STATUS CONGRUENCE AND COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY [J]. SOCIOMETRY, 1963, 26 (02): : 146 - 162

[9] Zaleznik A., 1958, MOTIVATION PRODUCTIV