POSTCRANIAL ESTIMATES OF BODY-WEIGHT IN PROCONSUL, WITH A NOTE ON A DISTAL TIBIA OF P-MAJOR FROM NAPAK, UGANDA

被引:61
作者
RAFFERTY, KL
WALKER, A
RUFF, CB
ROSE, MD
ANDREWS, PJ
机构
[1] UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY MED SCH, DEPT ANAT CELL BIOL & INJURY SCI, NEWARK, NJ 07103 USA
[2] NAT HIST MUSEUM, DEPT PALAEONTOL, LONDON SW7 5BD, ENGLAND
关键词
PROCONSUL; BODY WEIGHT ESTIMATION; POSTCRANIAL;
D O I
10.1002/ajpa.1330970406
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
A distal tibia of Proconsul major from Napak, Uganda, is described, It is morphologically similar to other Proconsul tibiae, only much larger in size. This specimen and others are used to estimate the body weight of P, major from postcrania for the first time. Body weight is predicted from articular and diaphyseal dimensions using regression equations derived from a modern comparative sample of catarrhine primates, The estimated body weight of P, major based on the Napak tibia is 86.7 kg, whereas two other P. major specimens are smaller, giving a total range of 63.4-86.7 kg and an average of 75.1 kg. The regression equations are also used to predict the body weight of specimens from Rusinga/Mfangano belonging to P. nyanzae and P. heseloni, As the body weight estimates generated here are consistent with previous postcranial-based estimates for Proconsul species, the two sets of estimates are pooled to give means of 10.9 kg for P. heseloni (n = 6) and 35.6 kg for P, nyanzae (n = 12). These findings support the traditional assignment of two species at Rusinga/Mfangano. The postcranial body weight estimates for the three species of Proconsul are compared to body weights estimated from M(1) area in order to investigate possible differences in scaling between the teeth and limbs in these species. Despite being based on a smaller sample size, the postcranial estimates clearly differentiate the three taxa, whereas the dental estimates form a more continuous distribution, Molar area overestimates body weight in P. heseloni, indicating that it is megadont compared to a large sample of modern anthropoid primates. In contrast, molar area underestimates body weight in P. nyanzae and especially P. major, suggesting relative microdonty in these taxa. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 402
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   EVOLUTION AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE HOMINOIDEA [J].
ANDREWS, P .
NATURE, 1992, 360 (6405) :641-646
[2]  
Andrews P.J., 1978, Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology, V30, P85
[3]   NEW POTASSIUM-ARGON AGE DETERMINATIONS RELEVANT TO MIOCENE FOSSIL MAMMAL SEQUENCE IN EAST AFRICA [J].
BISHOP, WW ;
MILLER, JA ;
FITCH, FJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1969, 267 (06) :669-&
[4]  
CLARK WEL, 1952, P ZOOL SOC LOND, V122, P273
[5]   PROBLEMS OF BODY-WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN FOSSIL PRIMATES [J].
CONROY, GC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 1987, 8 (02) :115-137
[6]   ALLOMETRIC SCALING IN THE DENTITION OF PRIMATES AND PREDICTION OF BODY-WEIGHT FROM TOOTH SIZE IN FOSSILS [J].
GINGERICH, PD ;
SMITH, BH ;
ROSENBERG, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1982, 58 (01) :81-100
[7]   EARLY CENOZOIC OMOMYIDAE AND THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF TARSIIFORM PRIMATES [J].
GINGERICH, PD .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 1981, 10 (04) :345-+
[8]   CORRELATION OF TOOTH SIZE AND BODY SIZE IN LIVING HOMINOID PRIMATES, WITH A NOTE ON RELATIVE BRAIN SIZE IN AEGYPTOPITHECUS AND PROCONSUL [J].
GINGERICH, PD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1977, 47 (03) :395-398
[9]  
Harrison T., 1982, THESIS U LONDON
[10]  
Hofman MA, 1988, HUMAN EVOL, V3, P177, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02437441