Risk under performance-based contracting in the UK construction sector

被引:60
作者
Gruneberg, Stephen [1 ]
Hughes, Will [1 ]
Ancell, Debbie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Sch Construct Management & Engn, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AW, Berks, England
关键词
Performance-based contracting; risk management; private finance initiative;
D O I
10.1080/01446190601164097
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As a method of procuring the services of the built environment, performance-based contracting (PBC) seeks to link the building supplier to longer term commitments than has traditionally been the case in the construction sector. By rewarding the building producer according to the way that building or structure delivers the users' requirements, rather than according to a list of assembled parts, a number of additional risks are taken by contractors, including fitness for purpose, costs and briefing. The extent to which contractors recognize these risks and their methods of dealing with them vary considerably and are influenced by their attitudes towards risk. As the risks associated with PBC are seen as large, uninsurable, and vulnerable to changing client requirements, the majority of respondents would reject the use of PBC as a method of contracting. Nevertheless, PBC may be used under particular conditions, where rewards are deemed sufficient to compensate for the additional risk to the contractor of undertaking work on the basis of a stream of payments paid over the life of a structure depending on the satisfactory performance of the building or as part of a private finance initiative.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 699
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Adams J., 1995, RISK
[2]  
Ang G., 2001, CIB WORLD BUILD C 20
[3]  
Bing L., 2005, INT J PROJ MANAG, V23, P25, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2004.04.006
[4]  
Bramwell J., 2003, PERFORMANCE BASED BU
[5]  
Brookes Ian., 2003, CHAMBERS DICT, V9th edition
[6]  
Dawson S, 1996, ANAL ORG
[7]  
Flanagan R., 1999, RISK MANAGEMENT CONS
[8]  
Foliente GC, 2000, FOREST PROD J, V50, P12
[9]  
Gruneberg S., 2005, 17 RICS
[10]  
Hattis DB, 2001, J TEST EVAL, V29, P413