PREOPERATIVE BOWEL PREPARATION - A SURVEY OF COLON AND RECTAL SURGEONS

被引:101
作者
SOLLA, JA
ROTHENBERGER, DA
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA,DEPT SURG COLON & RECTAL SURG,420 DELAWARE ST,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55455
[2] UNIV MINNESOTA,DEPT SURG,DIV COLON & RECTAL SURG,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55455
关键词
Bowel preparation; cleansing; colonic; Prophylactic antibiotics;
D O I
10.1007/BF02055549
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
A survey of 500 clinically active, board-certified colon and rectal surgeons in the United States and Canada was conducted to obtain data regarding current methods of bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A review of recent publications on preoperative bowel preparation was used to compare the current literature recommendations with the actual practice among the group surveyed. Responses were received from 352 of 500 colorectal surgeons to whom questionnaires were sent (70 percent response rate). All respondents used a mechanical preparation and some form of antibiotics. The favorite antibiotic regimen was oral antimicrobials combined with systemic antibiotics (88 percent). Concomitant administration of oral neomycin-erythromycin base and a systemic second generation cephalosporin active against both anaerobic and aerobic colonic bacteria, together with oral polyethelene glycol electrolyte mechanical colonic cleansing, was the most popular method of preoperative bowel preparation (58 percent). The second most frequent method of mechanical bowel cleansing consisted of conventional enemas, dietary restrictions, and cathartic preparations (36 percent). Mannitol solution (5 percent), and whole-gut irrigation per nasogastric tube (1 percent) were the least popular methods of mechanical bowel cleansing. The literature supports the current methods of preoperative bowel preparation used by the vast majority of surgeons surveyed. © 1990 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 159
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
BARBER MS, 1979, SURGERY, V86, P23
[2]   A SURVEY OF CLINICAL-TRIALS OF ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN COLON SURGERY - EVIDENCE AGAINST FURTHER USE OF NO-TREATMENT CONTROLS [J].
BAUM, ML ;
ANISH, DS ;
CHALMERS, TC ;
SACKS, HS ;
SMITH, H ;
FAGERSTROM, RM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 305 (14) :795-799
[3]   COMPARISON OF CLEANSING METHODS IN PREPARATION FOR COLONIC SURGERY [J].
BECK, DE ;
HARFORD, FJ ;
DIPALMA, JA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1985, 28 (07) :491-495
[4]  
BIGARD MA, 1979, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V77, P1307
[5]  
BOWEDEN TA, 1987, AM SURGEON, V53, P34
[6]   PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TICARCILLIN AND CEPHALOTHIN AS PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS FOR GASTROINTESTINAL OPERATIONS [J].
BROWN, JJ ;
MUTTON, TP ;
WASILAUSKAS, BL ;
MYERS, RT ;
MEREDITH, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 143 (03) :343-348
[7]   CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF WHOLE GUT LAVAGE AS A METHOD OF BOWEL PREPARATION FOR COLONIC OPERATIONS [J].
CHUNG, RS ;
GURLL, NJ ;
BERGLUND, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1979, 137 (01) :75-81
[8]   PREOPERATIVE ORAL ANTIBIOTICS REDUCE SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS OF COLON OPERATIONS - RESULTS OF PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL-STUDY [J].
CLARKE, JS ;
CONDON, RE ;
BARTLETT, JG ;
GORBACH, SL ;
NICHOLS, RL ;
OCHI, S .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1977, 186 (03) :251-259
[9]  
CONDON RE, 1982, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V117, P265
[10]  
CONDON RE, 1983, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V118, P496