COMPARISON OF AMANTADINE AND DESIPRAMINE COMBINED WITH PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF COCAINE DEPENDENCE

被引:100
作者
WEDDINGTON, WW [1 ]
BROWN, BS [1 ]
HAERTZEN, CA [1 ]
HESS, JM [1 ]
MAHAFFEY, JR [1 ]
KOLAR, AF [1 ]
JAFFE, JH [1 ]
机构
[1] NIDA,ADDICT RES CTR,BALTIMORE,MD 21224
关键词
D O I
10.3109/00952999108992817
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We conducted a single-blind, random assignment, placebo-controlled, 12-week comparison of desipramine hydrochloride and amantadine hydrochloride as adjunctive treatments to counseling for cocaine dependence. Subjects were 54 outpatients who met DSMIII-R criteria for active cocaine dependence and who completed a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment. Subjects treated with fixed doses of 200 mg/day desipramine (N = 17), 400 mg/day amantadine-placebo (N = 16), and placebo (N = 21) did not differ for lifetime cocaine use, lifetime histories of psychopathology, admission scores on psychometric assessments, and sociodemographics. All treatment groups demonstrated dramatic and persistent decreases in cocaine use, craving for cocaine, and psychiatric symptoms consequent to treatment. Although there was a trend for more dropouts by subjects taking desipramine, there were no significant differences among treatment groups regarding retention in treatment, craving for cocaine, and decreased cocaine use confirmed by urine toxicology. There was a trend for subjects treated with desipramine to maintain longer periods of cocaine abstinence. Mean plasma concentration of desipramine in a subsample of our subjects was less than that recommended for treatment of depression, thus the dosage of desipramine may have been subtherapeutic. © 1991 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 152
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
ADAMS E H, 1986, Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse, V6, P49
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V3rd
[3]   RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES AND DRUG-USE COLLECTED FROM NARCOTIC ADDICTS [J].
AMSEL, Z ;
MANDELL, W ;
MATTHIAS, L ;
MASON, C ;
HOCHERMAN, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1976, 11 (02) :325-336
[4]   PROPHYLACTIC AMANTADINE DOSE AND PLASMA-CONCENTRATION EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS IN HEALTHY-ADULTS [J].
AOKI, FY ;
STIVER, HG ;
SITAR, DS ;
BOUDREAULT, A ;
OGILVIE, RI .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1985, 37 (02) :128-136
[5]   CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS OF AMANTADINE HYDROCHLORIDE [J].
AOKI, FY ;
SITAR, DS .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1988, 14 (01) :35-51
[6]   RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF INTERVIEW DATA OBTAINED FROM 59 NARCOTIC DRUG ADDICTS [J].
BALL, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1967, 72 (06) :650-654
[7]   COCAINE AND D-AMPHETAMINE INDUCE CHANGES IN CENTRAL BETA-ADRENOCEPTOR SENSITIVITY - EFFECTS OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC DRUG-TREATMENT [J].
BANERJEE, SP ;
SHARMA, VK ;
KUNGCHEUNG, LS ;
CHANDA, SK ;
RIGGI, SJ .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1979, 175 (01) :119-130
[8]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[9]  
COLLIVER J, 1987, DECADE DAWN COCAINE
[10]  
DACKIS CA, 1985, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV RE, V9, P1