The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication

被引:101
作者
Darling, Emily S. [1 ]
Shiffman, David [2 ,3 ]
Cote, Isabelle M. [1 ]
Drew, Joshua A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Earth Ocean Res Grp, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Miami, Leonard & Jayne Abess Ctr Ecosyst Sci & Policy, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[3] Univ Miami, RJ Dunlap Marine Conservat Program, Miami, FL USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Environm Biol, New York, NY USA
来源
IDEAS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2013年 / 6卷 / 01期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
social media; tweets; altmetrics; scientific publishing; research workflow; productivity; crowd sourcing;
D O I
10.4033/iee.2013.6.6.f
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Twitter is a micro-blogging social media platform for short messages that can have a long-term impact on how scientists create and publish ideas. We investigate the usefulness of Twitter in the development and distribution of scientific knowledge. At the start of the 'life cycle' of a scientific publication, Twitter provides a large virtual department of colleagues that can help to rapidly generate, share and refine new ideas. As ideas become manuscripts, Twitter can be used as an informal arena for the pre-review of works in progress. Finally, tweeting published findings can communicate research to a broad audience of other researchers, decision makers, journalists and the general public that can amplify the scientific and social impact of publications. However, there are limitations, largely surrounding issues of intellectual property and ownership, inclusiveness and misrepresentations of science `sound bites'. Nevertheless, we believe Twitter is a useful social media tool that can provide a valuable contribution to scientific publishing in the 21st century.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Bar-Ilan J., 2012, 17 INT C SCI TECHN I, V1205, P5611
[2]   An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists [J].
Bik, Holly M. ;
Goldstein, Miriam C. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2013, 11 (04)
[3]   Figuring Out #Fukushima: An Initial Look at Functions and Content of US Twitter Commentary About Nuclear Risk [J].
Binder, Andrew R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2012, 6 (02) :268-277
[4]  
Chemistry Nature, 2013, NATURE CHEM, V5, P247
[5]   Altmetrics: too soon for use in assessment [J].
Cheung, Man Kit .
NATURE, 2013, 494 (7436) :176-176
[6]   Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact [J].
Eysenbach, Gunther .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04) :e123
[7]   Research Blogging: Indexing and Registering the Change in Science 2.0 [J].
Fausto, Sibele ;
Machado, Fabio A. ;
Bento, Luiz Fernando J. ;
Iamarino, Atila ;
Nahas, Tatiana R. ;
Munger, David S. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12)
[8]   Uses for Twitter across disciplines and throughout the scientific process [J].
Federer, Lisa M. .
IDEAS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2013, 6 (01) :44-45
[9]   Can blogging change how ecologists share ideas? In economics, it already has [J].
Fox, Jeremy W. .
IDEAS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 5 (02) :74-77
[10]   Adequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study [J].
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Delamothe, Tony ;
Godlee, Fiona ;
Lundh, Andreas .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 :383