EFFECTS OF CO2 AND TEMPERATURE ON GROWTH AND RESOURCE USE OF COOCCURRING C3 AND C4 ANNUALS

We examined how CO2 concentrations and temperature interacted to affect growth, resource acquisition, and resource allocation of two annual plants that were supplied with a single pulse of nutrients. Physiological and growth measurements were made on individuals of Abutilon theophrasti (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus (C4) grown in environments with atmospheric CO2 levels of 400 or 700-muL/L and with light/dark temperatures of 28-degrees/22-degrees or 38-degrees/31-degrees-C. Elevated CO2 and temperature treatments had significant independent and interactive effects on plant growth, resource allocation, and resource acquisition (i.e., photosynthesis and nitrogen uptake), and the strength and direction of these effects were often dependent on plant species. For example, final biomass of Amaranthus was enhanced by elevated CO2 at 28-degrees but was depressed at 38-degrees. For Abutilon, elevated CO2 increased initial plant relative growth rates at 28-degrees but not at 38-degrees, and had no significant effects on final biomass at either temperature. These results are interpreted in light of the interactive effects of CO2 and temperature on the rates of net leaf area production and loss, and on net whole-plant nitrogen retention. At 28-degrees-C, elevated CO2 stimulated the initial production of leaf area in both species, which led to an initial stimulation of biomass accumulation at the higher CO2 level. However, in elevated CO2 at 28-degrees, the rate of net leaf area loss for Abutilon increased while that of Amaranthus decreased. Furthermore, high CO2 apparently enhanced the ability of Amaranthus to retain nitrogen at this temperature, which may have helped to enhance photosynthesis, whereas nitrogen retention was unaffected in Abutilon. Thus, at 28-degrees, final biomass of Abutilon was not stimulated in a high CO2 environment whereas the final biomass of Amaranthus was. At 38-degrees, Abutilon had slightly reduced peak leaf areas under elevated CO2 in comparison to ambient CO2 grown plants, but increased rates of photosynthesis per unit leaf area early in the experiment apparently compensated for reduced leaf area. For Amaranthus at 38-degrees, peak leaf area production was not affected by CO2 treatment, but the rate of net leaf area loss hastened under elevated CO2 conditions and was accompanied by substantial reductions of whole-plant nitrogen content and leaf photosynthesis. This may have led to the reduced biomass accumulation of high CO2 grown plants that we observed during the last 30 d of growth. Plants of both species grown in elevated CO2 exhibited reduced tissue-specific rates of nitrogen absorption, increased plant photosynthetic rate per unit of conductance, and increased initial allocation of biomass to roots, irrespective of temperature. Plants of both species grown under an elevated temperature regime had substantially decreased reproductive allocation, increased allocation to stem biomass, and increased plant water flux at both CO2 treatments. The age of plants also affected our interpretations of plant responses to CO2 and temperature treatments. For example, significant effects of CO2 treatment on the growth of Abutilon were evident early, prior to the initiation of flowering, when nitrogen availability would have been highest and pot space would not have been limited. Nevertheless, the opposite was true for Amaranthus, in which significant effects of CO2 treatment on plant growth were not detectable until the final 30 d of the experiment. Elevated CO2 interacted with temperature to affect plant productivity in different ways than would have been predicted from plant responses to elevated CO2 alone. Furthermore, a majority of the interactive effects of CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth could be interpreted in light of their effects on the rates of net leaf area production and loss, nitrogen retention, and, to a lesser degree, photosynthesis and resource partitioning.