SENSITIVITY TO SPACE AND TIME RESOLUTION OF A HYDROLOGICAL MODEL USING DIGITAL ELEVATION DATA

被引:107
作者
BRUNEAU, P
GASCUELODOUX, C
ROBIN, P
MEROT, P
BEVEN, K
机构
[1] INRA Science du Sol, Rennes, 35042
[2] INRA, Rennes, 35042
[3] INRA Science du Sol, Rennes, 35042
[4] Centre for Research on Environmental Systems and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster
关键词
HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; DIGITAL ELEVATION DATA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPACE/TIME RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.3360090107
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The space and time resolutions used for the input variables of a distributed hydrological model have a sufficient impact on the model results. This resolution depends on the required accuracy, experimental site and the processes and variables taken into account in the hydrological model. The influence of space and time resolution is studied here for the case of TOPMODEL, a model based on the variable contributing area concept, applied to an experimental 12 km2 catchment (Coet-Dan, Brittany, France) during a two month winter period. A sensitivity analysis to space and time resolution is performed first for input variables derived from the digital elevation data, secondly for the optimized values of the TOPMODEL parameters and finally for modelling efficiency. This analysis clearly shows that a relevant domain of space and time resolutions where efficiency is fairly constant can be defined for the input topographic variables, as opposed to another domain of larger resolutions that induces a strong decrease of modelling efficiency. It also shows that the use of a single set of parameters, defined as mean values of parameters on this relevant domain of resolution, does not modify the accuracy of modelling. The sensitivity of the parameters to space and time resolution allows the physical significance of the parameter values to be discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 81
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Band L.E., Topographic partition of watersheds with digital elevation models, Wat. Resour. Res., 22, pp. 15-24, (1986)
  • [2] Barancourt C., Creutin J.D., Rivoirard J., A method for delineating and estimating rainfall fields, Wat. Resour. Res., 28, pp. 1133-1144, (1992)
  • [3] Beven K.J., Hillslope runoff processes and flood frequency characteristics, Hillslope Processes, pp. 187-202, (1986)
  • [4] Beven K.J., Towards the use of catchment geomorphology in flood frequency predictions, Earth Surf. Processes Landf., 12, pp. 69-82, (1987)
  • [5] Beven K.J., Changing ideas in hydrology. The case of physically based models, J. Hydrol., 105, pp. 157-172, (1989)
  • [6] Beven K.J., Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling, Adv. Wat. Resour., 16, pp. 41-51, (1993)
  • [7] Beven J.K., Kirkby M.J., A physically based, variable contributing area model of catchment hydrology, Hydrol. Sci., 24, pp. 43-69, (1979)
  • [8] Beven K.J., Wood E.F., Catchment geomorphology and the dynamics of runoff contributing areas, J. Hydrol., 65, pp. 139-158, (1983)
  • [9] Bruneau P., (1992)
  • [10] Merot P., Les zones de sources a surface variable et la question de leur localisation, Hydrol. Continent., 3, pp. 105-115, (1988)