VALIDATION OF A SURVEILLANCE CASE DEFINITION OF CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME

被引:78
作者
KATZ, JN
LARSON, MG
FOSSEL, AH
LIANG, MH
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV, SCH MED, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[2] HARVARD UNIV, SCH PUBL HLTH, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[3] BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP, ROBERT BRIGHAM MULTIPURPOSE ARTHRITIS CTR, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.81.2.189
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has proposed a surveillance case definition for work-related carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The case definition requires the presence of median nerve symptoms; one or more occupational risk factors; and objective evidence of CTS including one of three physical examination findings or nerve conduction tests diagnostic of CTS. We evaluated the performance of the NIOSH case difinition, restricting our analysis to cases in which physical examination findings served as the objective criterion. Nerve conduction studies were used as the gold standard. Seventy-eight workers were studied; 38 percent had CTS. The NIOSH case definition had sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI = 0.57, 0.77), specificity of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.47, 0.69), and positive and negative predictive values of 0.50 (95% CI = 0.39, 0.61) and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.64, 0.84), respectively. Overall 38 percent of subjects were classified incorrectly. In a sample with a prevalence of 15 percent, as might be encountered in high risk workplaces, the positive predictive value would be 0.22. In conclusion, when physical examination findings serve as the objective criterion the performance of the case definition is modest reflecting the limited diagnostic value of its component tests and indicating that effective screening for CTS awaits improved diagnostic techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 193
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] ARMSTRONG TJ, 1979, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V21, P481
  • [2] BARNHART S, 1987, WESTERN J MED, V147, P37
  • [3] CANNON LJ, 1981, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V23, P255
  • [4] EFFICACY OF PROVOCATIVE TESTS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME
    DEKROM, MCTFM
    KNIPSCHILD, PG
    KESTER, ADM
    SPAANS, F
    [J]. LANCET, 1990, 335 (8686) : 393 - 395
  • [5] Dellon A L, 1978, J Hand Surg Am, V3, P474
  • [6] CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME - A REVIEW
    DORWART, BB
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1984, 14 (02) : 134 - 140
  • [7] Galen RS, 1975, NORMALITY PREDICTIVE
  • [8] CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME - AN EVALUATION OF THE PROVOCATIVE DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS
    GELLMAN, H
    GELBERMAN, RH
    TAN, AM
    BOTTE, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1986, 68A (05) : 735 - 737
  • [9] GOLDING DN, 1986, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V25, P388
  • [10] CARPAL-TUNNEL DECOMPRESSION IN SPITE OF NORMAL ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
    GRUNDBERG, AB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1983, 8 (03): : 348 - 349