GASTRODUODENAL TOXICITY OF DIFFERENT NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS

被引:64
作者
TRAVERSA, G
WALKER, AM
IPPOLITO, FM
CAFFARI, B
CAPURSO, L
DEZI, A
KOCH, M
MAGGINI, M
ALEGIANI, SS
RASCHETTI, R
机构
[1] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome
[2] Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
[3] Epidemiology Resources Inc., Newton Lower Falls, MA
[4] Center for Digestive Diseases, Ospedale San Filippo Neri, Rome
关键词
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY; NSAIDS; KETOROLAC; GASTRODUODENAL LESIONS; ESOPHAGEAL LESIONS; CASE-CONTROL STUDY;
D O I
10.1097/00001648-199501000-00010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Although the etiologic relation between nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use and gastrointestinal lesions is well documented, newly introduced NSAIDs deserve a fresh examination for their risk/benefit ratio. To estimate the association between consumption of ketorolac and the occurrence of gastroduodenal lesions, we conducted a case-control study. The study population comprised 600 outpatients with a confirmed endoscopic diagnosis of ulcer and erosion in 1991 and 1992 and 6,000 community controls matched by age and sex. We retrieved the prescription history through a computerized prescription monitoring system. We defined exposure to each study drug as ''current'' (month of endoscopy and preceding month), ''recent'' (second or third month preceding endoscopy), and ''past'' (fourth to sixth month preceding endoscopy). Current users of NSAIDs showed a 30% increase in the incidence of gastroduodenal lesions [odds ratio (OR) = 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.98-1.8] after adjustment for recent or past use of any NSAID, recent or past gastrotoxic therapy, recent or past use of gastroprotective drugs, and recent or past use of any other drug. Among NSAIDs, ketorolac was the only one showing a distinctly elevated risk of gastroduodenal lesions (OR = 4.2; 95% CI = 1.9-9.4). Current use of any NSAID was associated with almost a doubting of risk for ulcer alone (OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.3-3.0); no elevation in risk was found for erosions. The adjusted relative risk for ulcer associated with current use of ketorolac was 9.8 (95% CI = 3.4-28.1). Recent and past use of NSAIDs does not increase the risk of ulcer. The use of ketorolac appears to carry a greater gastrotoxicity than other NSAIDs.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 54
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Maratka Z., Terminology, Definitions and Diagnostic Criteria in Digestive Endoscopy, Bad Homburg, (1989)
[2]  
Traversa G., Maggini M., Raschetti R., Drug Prescription Monitoring Systems in General Practice, Ann 1st Super Sanitii, 27, pp. 189-201, (1991)
[3]  
Raschetti R., Spila Alegiani S., Diana G., Da Cas R., Traversa G., Pasquini P., Antipsychotic drug prescription in general practice in Italy, Acta Psychiatr Scand, 87, pp. 317-321, (1993)
[4]  
Guideline for ATC Classification, (1990)
[5]  
Garcia Rodriguez L.A., Walker A.M., Perez Gutthann S., Nonsteroidal antiin’ flammatory drugs and gastrointestinal hospitalization in Saskatchewan: A cohort study, Epidemiology, 3, pp. 337-342, (1992)
[6]  
Griffin M.R., Piper J.M., Daugherty J.R., Snowden M., Ray W.A., Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and increased risk for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons, Ann Intern Med, 114, pp. 257-263, (1991)
[7]  
Gabriel S.E., Jaakkimainen L., Bombardier C., Risk for serious gastrointestinal complications related to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Ann Intern Med, 115, pp. 787-796, (1991)
[8]  
Bollini P., Garcia Rodriguez L.A., Perez Gutthann S., Walker A.M., The impact of research quality and study design on epidemiologic estimates of the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on upper gastrointestinal tract disease, Arch Intern Med, 152, pp. 1289-1295, (1992)
[9]  
Sommerville K., Faulkner G., Langman M., Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and bleeding peptic ulcer, Lancet, 1, pp. 462-464, (1986)
[10]  
Hawkey C.J., Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and peptic ulcer: Facts and figures multiply, but do they add up?, Br Med J, 300, pp. 278-284, (1990)