Structural equation modelling of organizational justice and cooperative behaviour in the construction project claims process: contractors' perspectives

被引:62
作者
Aibinu, Ajibade Ayodeji [1 ]
Ling, Florence Yean Yng [2 ]
Ofori, George [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Bldg, Singapore 117566, Singapore
关键词
Claims; cooperation; conflict; organizational justice; structural equation model;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2011.564195
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A cooperative attitude is essential for successful teamwork in construction. The levels of conflict and dispute on construction projects are conceptualized as forms of cooperative/uncooperative attitude. A theoretical model demonstrates how conflict intensity, contractors' dispute tendencies and six identified constructs of organizational justice interact with and relate to each other. The model is tested using a structural equation modelling technique with partial least-squares estimation. It uses survey data obtained from 41 contractors regarding their project experience. The results suggest that perceptions about organizational justice either promote or hinder cooperative behaviour in the construction project delivery process. Organizational justice, or at least people's perceptions of it, influenced 38% of conflict intensity levels, and altered 46% of contractors' tendencies to dispute. Perceptions about the quantum of claims approved (favourability of the outcome and the perceived fairness of the outcome) influenced the levels of conflict and dispute. However, the way people are treated (quality of treatment) and the way claims are administered (quality of decision-making) have the largest impact on the model developed. Cooperative behaviour can be promoted on projects by managing construction claims in a proactive manner and by proper implementation of the claims mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 481
页数:19
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Abrahamson M., 1984, INT CONSTRUCTION LAW, V1, P241
[2]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[3]   Avoiding and Mitigating Delay and Disruption Claims Conflict: Role of Precontract Negotiation [J].
Aibinu, Ajibade Ayodeji .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 1 (01) :47-58
[4]   DONT BURN THAT BRIDGE [J].
ALQUDSI, H .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1995, 11 (06) :22-25
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1976, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY
[6]   LITIGATION AND SETTLEMENT UNDER IMPERFECT INFORMATION [J].
BEBCHUK, LA .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1984, 15 (03) :404-415
[7]   THE NATURE OF THE DISPUTE AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNATIONAL MEDIATION [J].
BERCOVITCH, J ;
LANGLEY, J .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1993, 37 (04) :670-691
[8]  
Bies R.J., 1986, RES NEGOTIATION ORG, V1, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425]
[9]   COMPENSATION AND THE SOCIAL-STRUCTURE OF MISFORTUNE [J].
BLACK, D .
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 1987, 21 (04) :563-584
[10]  
Blau P.M., 1964, EXCHANGE POWER SOC