DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP IN MULTISTAGE CARCINOGENESIS - PROMOTERS

被引:12
作者
KITCHIN, KT [1 ]
BROWN, JL [1 ]
SETZER, RW [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA,HLTH EFFECTS RES LAB,DIV RES SUPPORT,RES TRIANGLE PK,NC 27711
关键词
D O I
10.1289/ehp.94102s1255
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Published dose-response curves of promoters of multistage carcinogenesis were selected that met the combined criteria of long study times, multiple doses, and low doses. In rat liver, 12 dose-response studies of 7 different promoters (phenobarbital, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin [TCDD], clophen A-50 (a polychlorinated biphenyl), alpha-, beta-, and gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane [HCH], and chloroform) were selected. These promoters were studied for 7-86 weeks and either altered hepatic foci or hepatic cancer were determined. The doses ranged from 1 ng (TCDD) to 400 mg (chloroform). In mouse skin, 10 dose-response studies of 4 promoters (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate [TPA], anthralin, chrysarobin, and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroperoxyl-2,5-cyclohexadienone [BHTOOH]) were selected. In these mouse skin studies the doses ranged from 0.425 nmole (TPA) to 20,000 mnole (BHTOOH) per mouse. The length of time promoters were applied to the skin varied between 15 and 60 weeks. Either skin papillomas or carcinomas were determined. The dose-response relationships are presented on the basis of moles of promoter, percentage of the fully effective promoting dose, of percentage of the acute oral rat LD(50). The degree of concavity of the dose-response curves was determined. The available dose-response data are critiqued and discussed on the basis of future research needs for biologically based cancer risk assessment models.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 264
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   CONSIDERATION OF BOTH GENOTOXIC AND NONGENOTOXIC MECHANISMS IN PREDICTING CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL [J].
BUTTERWORTH, BE .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1990, 239 (02) :117-132
[2]   CELL-PROLIFERATION IN CARCINOGENESIS [J].
COHEN, SM ;
ELLWEIN, LB .
SCIENCE, 1990, 249 (4972) :1007-1011
[3]   DOSE-DEPENDENT PROMOTING ACTIVITY OF CHLOROFORM IN RAT-LIVER FOCI BIOASSAY [J].
DEML, E ;
OESTERLE, D .
CANCER LETTERS, 1985, 29 (01) :59-63
[4]   DOSE-RESPONSE OF PROMOTION BY POLYCHLORINATED-BIPHENYLS AND CHLOROFORM IN RAT-LIVER FOCI BIOASSAY [J].
DEML, E ;
OESTERLE, D .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 1987, 60 (1-3) :209-211
[5]  
DIGIOVANNI J, 1985, CANCER RES, V45, P2584
[6]  
DIGIOVANNI J, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P1398
[7]  
DRIVER HE, 1986, BRIT J EXP PATHOL, V67, P131
[8]  
FARMER JH, 1979, J ENVIRON PATHOL TOX, V3, P55
[9]  
GREIM H, 1984, IARC SCI PUBL, V56, P487
[10]   ANALYSIS OF 2,3,7,8-TCDD TUMOR PROMOTION ACTIVITY AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO CANCER [J].
HOLDER, JW ;
MENZEL, HM .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1989, 19 (1-6) :861-868