H-1-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS - COMPARATIVE TOLERABILITY AND SAFETY

被引:114
作者
ESTELLE, F
SIMONS, R
机构
[1] Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
[2] Children’S Hospital of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1S1
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00002018-199410050-00002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
First-generation histamine H-1-receptor antagonists, such as diphenhydramine, triprolidine, hydroxyzine or chlorpheniramine (chlorphenamine), frequently cause somnolence or other CNS adverse effects. Second-generation H-1-antagonists, such as terfenadine, astemizole, loratadine and cetirizine, represent a true advance in therapeutics. In manufacturers' recommended doses, they have a more favourable benefit/risk ratio than their predecessors with regard to lack of CNS effects, and do not exacerbate the adverse CNS effects of alcohol or other CNS-active chemicals. Rarely, some of the newer H-1-antagonists may cause cardiac dysrhythmias after overdose or under other specific conditions. The concept of a risk-free H-1-antagonist is proving to be an oversimplification. An H-1-antagonist absolutely free from adverse effects under all circumstances is not yet available for use. The magnitude of the beneficial effects of each H-1-antagonist should be related to the magnitude of the unwanted effects. especially in the CNS and cardiovascular system, and a benefit-risk ratio or therapeutic index should be developed for each medication in this class.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 380
页数:31
相关论文
共 182 条
  • [1] Adam K., Oswald I., The hypnotic effects of an antihistamine: promethazine, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 22, pp. 715-717, (1986)
  • [2] Adelsberg B.R., D'Amico-Beadon A., The effects of loratadine, diphenhydramine and placebo on worker productivity: results of a double blind trial, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 85, (1990)
  • [3] Affrime M.B., Lorber R., Danzig M., Cuss F., Brannan M.D., Three month evaluation of electrocardiographic effects of loratadine in humans, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 91, (1993)
  • [4] Ahn H-S, Barnett A., Selective displacement of [<sup>3</sup>H]mepyramine from peripheral vs. central nervous system receptors by loratadine, a non-sedating antihistamine, European Journal of Pharmacology, 127, pp. 153-155, (1986)
  • [5] Alford C., Bhatti J.Z., Rombaut N.E.I., Curran S., Hindmarch I., A comparison of antihistamines using EEG and questionnaire-based assessments, Medical Science Research, 17, pp. 421-423, (1989)
  • [6] Alford C., Rombaut N., Jones J., Foley S., Idzikowski C., Et al., Acute effects of hydroxyzine on nocturnal sleep and sleep tendency the following day: a C-EEG study, Human Psychopharmacology, 7, pp. 25-35, (1992)
  • [7] Arisaka O., Shimura N., Nakayama Y., Yabuta K., Cyproheptadine and growth, American Journal of Diseases of Children, 142, pp. 914-915, (1988)
  • [8] Arriaga F., Rombaut N., Absence of central effects with levocabastine eye drops, Allergy, 45, pp. 552-554, (1990)
  • [9] Aselton P., Jick H., Milunsky A., Hunter J.R., Stergachis A., First-trimester drug use and congenital disorders, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 65, pp. 451-455, (1985)
  • [10] Aso T., Sakai Y., Effect of terfenadine, a novel antihistamine, on actual driving performance, Annals of Allergy, 62, (1989)