EFFECTS OF 2 VOICE CHARACTERISTICS ON THE ATTITUDES TOWARD ADVERTISING MESSAGES

被引:30
作者
GELINASCHEBAT, C [1 ]
CHEBAT, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV QUEBEC,DEPT LINGUIST,MONTREAL H3C 3P8,QUEBEC,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00224545.1992.9924724
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study explored the effects of two prosodic variables, voice intonation and voice intensity, on the attitudes of a sample of Canadian students toward two messages advertising automated teller machines and student loans. The elaboration likelihood model (ELM) was used as a theoretical framework. The ELM proposes that peripheral cues such as voice characteristics should enhance the receiver's attitude only under low-issue involvement situations. A 2 x 2 x 2 (Level of Intensity x Level of Intonation x Levels of Issue Involvement) experiment was used. The two advertising messages provided very different levels of issue involvement, measured in terms of the Zaichkowski scale (1985) by the 221 subjects. The results confirmed those proposed by the ELM-that the two voice characteristics are significant only under low-involvement conditions. The most efficient voice combined low-intonation and low-intensity features and was interpreted as efficient because its qualities bypassed the respondents' defense mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 459
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ANDREASEN NC, 1981, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V38, P281
[2]  
Arnold M. B, 1961, EMOTION PERSONALITY
[3]  
Barak A., 1988, COUNS EDUC SUPERV, V27, P355
[4]   THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF REQUEST FORM AND SPEAKER STATUS ON JUDGMENTS OF REQUESTS [J].
BECKER, JA ;
KIMMEL, HD ;
BEVILL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1989, 18 (05) :521-531
[5]   PERSONAL OPACITY AND SOCIAL INFORMATION GATHERING - EXPLORATIONS IN STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION [J].
BERGER, CR ;
KELLERMANN, K .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1989, 16 (03) :314-351
[6]   LEXICAL DIVERSITY AND MAGNITUDE OF CONVERGENT VERSUS DIVERGENT STYLE SHIFTING - PERCEPTUAL AND EVALUATIVE CONSEQUENCES [J].
BRADAC, JJ ;
MULAC, A ;
HOUSE, A .
LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION, 1988, 8 (3-4) :213-228
[7]  
BRICKMAN GA, 1980, J ADVERTISING RES, V20, P69
[8]  
Brooke ME., 1986, J LANGUAGE SOCIAL PS, V5, P201, DOI [10.1177/0261927x8600500303, DOI 10.1177/0261927X8600500303]
[9]  
CHEBAT JC, 1986, J PSYCHOL, V122, P609
[10]  
CHEBAT JC, 1989, J SOC PSYCHOL, V130, P157