MUTANT DN INFLUENCES DRY-MATTER DISTRIBUTION, ASSIMILATE PARTITIONING AND FLOWERING IN LATHYRUS-ODORATUS L

被引:22
作者
BEVERIDGE, CA [1 ]
ROSS, JJ [1 ]
MURFET, IC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TASMANIA,DEPT PLANT SCI,GPO BOX 252C,HOBART,TAS 7001,AUSTRALIA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
ASSIMILATE PARTITIONING; BRANCHING; FLOWERING; MUTANT; SWEET PEA;
D O I
10.1093/jxb/43.1.55
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The flowering mutant dn in sweet pea was used as a tool to study C-14-assimilate and dry matter partitioning with respect to nutrient diversion theories on the control of flower initiation. Wild type plants (Dn(h)) are photoperiodic and exhibit late flowering and profuse basal branching in short days while mutant plants (dn) are day neutral, early flowering and devoid of basal laterals. In short days, dn plants exported a significantly greater proportion of assimilate acropetally than Dn(h) plants and the upper portion of dn plants had a greater dry weight. These differences were reduced dramatically when basal laterals were excised regularly from the Dn(h) plants although the difference in flowering remained. However, the effect of dn on resource allocation within the apical region may be more important in regard to flowering than the effect on acropetal versus basipetal movement. In short days, the dn plants partitioned significantly more resources into their internodes and petioles, and less into their leaflets, than Dn(h) plants as shown by dry weight and C-14-assimilate measurements. These differences were apparent from as early as node 7 up to the node of flower initiation in dn plants (approximately node 30) and they were not eliminated by removal of basal laterals from Dn(h) plants. Differences between dn and Dn(h) plants in partitioning and flowering were largely eliminated under long days. The fact that in this species a single gene influences both resource allocation and flower initiation lends further support to nutrient diversion hypotheses on the control of flowering.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   THE CONTROL OF FLORAL EVOCATION AND MORPHOGENESIS [J].
BERNIER, G .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1988, 39 :175-219
[2]  
BODSON M, 1985, PHYSIOL VEG, V23, P491
[3]  
BODSON M, 1987, MANIPULATION FLOWERI, P341
[4]  
JACOBS WP, 1953, AM J BOT, P385
[5]   USE OF A FLOWERING MUTANT TO INVESTIGATE CHANGES IN CARBOHYDRATES DURING FLORAL TRANSITION IN RED-CLOVER [J].
JONES, TWA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1990, 41 (229) :1013-1019
[6]   PHOTOPERIODIC AND GENETIC-CONTROL OF CARBON PARTITIONING IN PEAS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO APICAL SENESCENCE [J].
KELLY, MO ;
DAVIES, PJ .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 86 (03) :978-982
[7]   Inheritance of earliness of flowering in the sweet pea [J].
Little, TM ;
Kantor, JH .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1941, 32 :379-383
[8]   FLOWERING IN PISUM - A 5TH LOCUS, VEG [J].
REID, JB ;
MURFET, IC .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1984, 53 (03) :369-382
[9]  
ROSS JJ, 1990, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V79, P453, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1990.tb02102.x
[10]  
ROSS JJ, 1986, ANN BOT-LONDON, V57, P191