NON-BREEDING-TEST METHODS FOR DOMINANT SKELETAL MUTATIONS SHOWN BY ETHYLNITROSOUREA TO BE EASILY APPLICABLE TO OFFSPRING EXAMINED IN SPECIFIC-LOCUS EXPERIMENTS

被引：22

作者：

SELBY, PB ^{[1
]}

NIEMANN, SL ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] ST OLAF COLL,NORTHFIELD,MN 55057

来源：

MUTATION RESEARCH | 1984年 / 127卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/0027-5107(84)90144-1

中图分类号：

Q3 [遗传学];

学科分类号：

071007 ; 090102 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：93 / 105

页数：13

共 18 条

[1] A note on the staining of the skeleton of cleared - Specimens with alizarin red S [J].

Dawson, AB .

STAIN TECHNOLOGY, 1926, 1 (04) :123-124

[2]

EHLING UH, 1966, GENETICS, V54, P1381

[3] DOMINANT CATARACT MUTATIONS AND SPECIFIC-LOCUS MUTATIONS IN MICE INDUCED BY RADIATION OR ETHYLNITROSOUREA [J].

EHLING, UH ;

FAVOR, J ;

KRATOCHVILOVA, J ;

NEUHAUSERKLAUS, A .

MUTATION RESEARCH, 1982, 92 (1-2) :181-192

[4]

FAVOR J, 1983, MUTAT RES, V110, P367, DOI 10.1016/0027-5107(83)90153-7

[5]

GREEN EL, 1951, GENETICS, V36, P391

[6]

JOHNSON FM, 1983, ENVIRON MUTAGEN, V5, P496

[7] DOSE-RESPONSE CURVE FOR ETHYLNITROSOUREA-INDUCED SPECIFIC-LOCUS MUTATIONS IN MOUSE SPERMATOGONIA [J].

RUSSELL, WL ;

HUNSICKER, PR ;

RAYMER, GD ;

STEELE, MH ;

STELZNER, KF ;

THOMPSON, HM .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1982, 79 (11) :3589-3591

[8] EFFECT OF DOSE FRACTIONATION ON THE ETHYLNITROSOUREA INDUCTION OF SPECIFIC-LOCUS MUTATIONS IN MOUSE SPERMATOGONIA [J].

RUSSELL, WL ;

HUNSICKER, PR ;

CARPENTER, DA ;

CORNETT, CV ;

GUINN, GM .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1982, 79 (11) :3592-3593

[9] SPECIFIC-LOCUS TEST SHOWS ETHYLNITROSOUREA TO BE THE MOST POTENT MUTAGEN IN THE MOUSE [J].

RUSSELL, WL ;

KELLY, EM ;

HUNSICKER, PR ;

BANGHAM, JW ;

MADDUX, SC ;

PHIPPS, EL .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1979, 76 (11) :5818-5819

[10] X-RAY-INDUCED MUTATIONS IN MICE [J].

RUSSELL, WL .

COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY, 1951, 16 :327-336

← 1 2 →