GENDER DIFFERENCES IN VERTEBRAL SIZES IN ADULTS - BIOMECHANICAL IMPLICATIONS

被引:151
作者
GILSANZ, V
BOECHAT, MI
GILSANZ, R
LORO, ML
ROE, TF
GOODMAN, WG
机构
[1] CHILDRENS HOSP LOS ANGELES, DEPT PEDIAT, LOS ANGELES, CA 90027 USA
[2] UNIV SO CALIF, SCH MED, LOS ANGELES, CA USA
[3] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, SCH MED, DEPT RADIOL, LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 USA
[4] GILSANZ MURRAY STEFICEK STRUCT ENGINEERS, NEW YORK, NY USA
关键词
OSTEOPOROSIS; SPINE; ANATOMY; CT; FRACTURES;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115610
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine if vertebral bone densities or vertebral body sizes contribute to gender differences in vertebral bone mass in adults. MATERLALS AND METHODS: Cancellous and cortical bone densities and dimensions of three lumbar vertebrae in 25 women and 18 men were measured with quantitative computed tomography (CT) and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Neither cancellous nor cortical vertebral bone densities differed in healthy adults. Vertebral bodies in women had lower cross-sectional areas (8.22 cm(2) +/- 1.09 [standard deviation] versus 10.98 cm(2) +/- 1.25, P <.001) and volumes (22.42 cm(3) +/- 2.40 versus 30.86 cm(3) +/- 2.6, P <.001). These differences also were evident in men and women matched for age, weight, vertebral bone density, and vertebral body height. Overall cross-sectional areas of vertebral bodies are 25% smaller in women than men. Vertebral bone densities do not differ between sexes. Estimates of mechanical stress within vertebral bodies are 30%-40% higher in women than men for equivalent applied loads. CONCLUSION: Smaller vertebral bodies in women confer biomechanical disadvantages that may contribute to more vertebral fractures in elderly women.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 682
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] ARNOLD J. S., 1966, CLIN ORTHOP RELATED RES, V49, P17
  • [2] ASSESSMENT OF ABDOMINAL FAT-CONTENT BY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    BORKAN, GA
    GERZOF, SG
    ROBBINS, AH
    HULTS, DE
    SILBERT, CK
    SILBERT, JE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1982, 36 (01) : 172 - 177
  • [3] QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY FOR PREDICTION OF VERTEBRAL FRACTURE RISK
    CANN, CE
    GENANT, HK
    KOLB, FO
    ETTINGER, B
    [J]. BONE, 1985, 6 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [4] BONE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH - INFLUENCE OF DENSITY AND STRAIN RATE
    CARTER, DR
    HAYES, WC
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1976, 194 (4270) : 1174 - 1176
  • [5] COMPARTMENTAL BODY-COMPOSITION BASED ON TOTAL-BODY NITROGEN, POTASSIUM, AND CALCIUM
    COHN, SH
    VARTSKY, D
    YASUMURA, S
    SAWITSKY, A
    ZANZI, I
    VASWANI, A
    ELLIS, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 239 (06): : E524 - E530
  • [6] EPIDEMIOLOGY OF OSTEOPOROSIS AND OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES
    CUMMINGS, SR
    KELSEY, JL
    NEVITT, MC
    ODOWD, KJ
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1985, 7 : 178 - 208
  • [7] DIXON WJ, 1983, INTRO STATISTICAL AN
  • [8] QUANTITATIVE HISTOLOGICAL STUDIES ON AGE CHANGES IN BONE
    DUNNILL, MS
    ANDERSON, JA
    WHITEHEAD, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND BACTERIOLOGY, 1967, 94 (02): : 275 - +
  • [9] MEASUREMENT OF SPINE DENSITY IN NORMAL AND OSTEOPOROTIC SUBJECTS USING COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY - RELATIONSHIP OF SPINE DENSITY TO FRACTURE THRESHOLD AND FRACTURE INDEX
    GALLAGHER, C
    GOLDGAR, D
    MAHONEY, P
    MCGILL, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1985, 9 (03) : 634 - 635
  • [10] GENANT H, 1983, WESTERN J MED, V139, P75