PRECISION AND STABILITY OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS

被引:215
作者
JOHNSON, J
DAWSONHUGHES, B
机构
[1] Calcium and Bone Metabolism Lab, USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, 02111, MA
关键词
DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; PRECISION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/BF02556113
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
This study was performed to determine the precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements, to compare bone mineral density (BMD) of subjects measured by DEXA and radionuclide dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA), and to evaluate different absorber materials for use with an external standard. Short-term precision (% coefficient of variation, CV) was determined in 6 subjects scanned six times each with repositioning, initially and 9 months later. Mean CV was 1.04% for spine and 2.13% for femoral neck BMD; for whole-body measurements in 5 subjects, mean CV was 0.64% for BMD, 2.2% for fat, and 1.05% for lean body mass. Precision of aluminum phantom measurements made over a 9-month period was 0.89% with the phantom in 15.2 cm, 0.88% in 20.3 cm, and 1.42% in 27.9 cm of water. In 51 subjects, BMD by DEXA and DPA was correlated for the spine (r = 0.98, P = 0.000) and femoral neck (r = 0.91, P = 0.000). Spine BMD was 4.5% lower and femoral neck BMD 3.1% higher by DEXA than by DPA. An aluminum phantom was scanned repeatedly, in both water and in an oil/water (30:70) mixture at thicknesses ranging from 15.2 through 27.9 cm. Phantom BMD was lower at 15.2 cm than at higher thicknesses of both water and oil/water (P = 0.05, ANOVA). The phantom was scanned repeatedly in 15.2, 20.3, and 27.9 cm of water over a 9 month period. In 15.2 and 20.3 cm of water, phantom BMD did not vary significantly whereas in 27.9 cm of water (equivalent to a human over 30 cm thick), phantom BMD increased 2.3% (P = 0.01) over the 9 months.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 178
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
X-RAY DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY - A NEW METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF BONE-DENSITY [J].
CULLUM, ID ;
ELL, PJ ;
RYDER, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1989, 62 (739) :587-592
[2]
CORRECTION OF THE EFFECTS OF SOURCE, SOURCE STRENGTH, AND SOFT-TISSUE THICKNESS ON SPINE DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS [J].
DAWSONHUGHES, B ;
DEEHR, MS ;
BERGER, PS ;
DALLAL, GE ;
SADOWSKI, LJ .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 44 (04) :251-257
[3]
DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY - COMPARISON OF BONE-MINERAL AND SOFT-TISSUE MASS MEASUREMENTS INVIVO WITH ESTABLISHED METHODS [J].
HEYMSFIELD, SB ;
WANG, J ;
HESHKA, S ;
KEHAYIAS, JJ ;
PIERSON, RN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1989, 49 (06) :1283-1289
[4]
QUANTITATIVE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS DUAL PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
KELLY, TL ;
SLOVIK, DM ;
SCHOENFELD, DA ;
NEER, RM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1988, 67 (04) :839-844
[5]
DUAL PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY INCREASE WITH SOURCE LIFE [J].
LINDSAY, R ;
FEY, C ;
HABOUBI, A .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1987, 41 (05) :293-294
[6]
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY BONE DENSITOMETER [J].
MAZESS, R ;
COLLICK, B ;
TREMPE, J ;
BARDEN, H ;
HANSON, J .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 44 (03) :228-232
[7]
MAZESS RB, 1988, ANN CHIR GYNAECOL FE, V77, P197
[8]
NIJS J, 1988, BONE MEASUREMENTS PH, P451
[9]
NILAS L, 1988, BONE MINER, V3, P305
[10]
DUAL ENERGY RADIOGRAPHY (DER) - A PRELIMINARY COMPARATIVE-STUDY [J].
PACIFICI, R ;
RUPICH, R ;
VERED, I ;
FISCHER, KC ;
GRIFFIN, M ;
SUSMAN, N ;
AVIOLI, LV .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1988, 43 (03) :189-191