STIFFENING EFFECTS OF CORTICAL BONE ON VERTEBRAL CANCELLOUS BONE IN-SITU

被引:25
作者
BRYCE, R
ASPDEN, RM
WYTCH, R
机构
[1] UNIV ABERDEEN,DEPT ORTHOPAED,ABERDEEN AB9 2ZD,SCOTLAND
[2] UNIV ABERDEEN,DEPT BIOMED PHYS,ABERDEEN AB9 2ZD,SCOTLAND
关键词
BONE; MECHANICAL STRESS; SPINAL FRACTURES; VERTEBRAL STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199505000-00004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. This study tested a theory about vertebral cancellous bone stiffness by performing experimental tests and comparing the results with the theoretical predictions. Objectives. To test experimentally a theoretical prediction that vertebral cancellous bone appears stiffer than would be expected from isolated tests because of the constraining effects of the cortical bone, to measure the magnitude of this strengthening effect and its dependency on tissue composition and density. Summary of Background Data. Vertebral bodies are composed mainly of cancellous bone surrounded by a thin shell of much stronger cortical bone. Little is known of the ways in which these two materials function synergistically to produce strong but light structures and why sometimes extensive damage to the cancellous bone has apparently little outward effect on vertebral body strength. Methods. Cancellous bone from 45 lumbar vertebrae from a homogeneous group of pigs was tested in compression both in situ in the vertebral body and as an excised cylinder. The density and composition of the bone were then measured and correlation tested with both of the stiffness measurements. Results. The cancellous bone in situ appears much stiffer than when isolated by a factor of about 4 (range, 1.6-12). No correlation was found between stiffness, either in situ or in isolation, and density, although density is predicted entirely by the volume fractions of water, organic, and mineral phases. Conclusions. Combining low density cancellous bone with stiffer, more dense cortical bone leads to a lightweight structure that is much stronger than might be expected from the isolated properties of its components.
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1003
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
Adams M.A., Hutton W.C., The effect of posture on the role of the apophyseal joints in resisting intervertebral compressive forces, J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 62, pp. 358-362, (1980)
[2]
Aspden R.M., Constraining the lateral dimensions of uniaxially loaded materials increases the calculated strength and stiffness: Application to muscle and bone, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 1, pp. 100-104, (1990)
[3]
Carter D.R., Hayes W.C., The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure, J Bone Jt Surg [Am], 59, pp. 954-962, (1977)
[4]
Gibson L.J., Ashby M.F., Cellular Solids, (1988)
[5]
Harley R., James D., Miller A., White J.D., Phonons and the elastic moduli of collagen and muscle, Nature, 267, pp. 285-287, (1977)
[6]
Hukins D., Aspden R.M., Composition and properties of connective tissues, Trends Biochem Sei, 10, pp. 260-264, (1985)
[7]
Katz J.L., Hard tissue as a composite material. I. Bounds on the elastic behaviour, J Biomech, 4, pp. 455-473, (1971)
[8]
Lees S., Sonic Velocity and the Ultrastructure of Mineralised Tissues, pp. 121-152, (1988)
[9]
Lees S., Ahern J.M., Leonard M., Parameters influencing the sonic velocity in compact calcified tissues of various species, J Acoust Soc Am, 74, pp. 28-33, (1983)
[10]
Linde F., Hvid I., The effect of constraint on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens, J Biomech, 22, pp. 485-490, (1989)